2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.ss.0000227361.36922.ad
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sprinkler Droplet Energy Effects on Soil Penetration Resistance and Aggregate Stability and Size Distribution

Abstract: Sprinkler droplet energy degrades surface soil structure. Modifying sprinkler irrigation systems to reduce droplet energy may reduce surface sealing and crusting, thereby increasing emergence. From 1997 to 2001, we evaluated the effects of sprinkler droplet kinetic energies of 0, 8, and 16J kg -1 on in situ surface penetration resistance (PR, a measure of crust strength), aggregate stability (a measure of a soil's resistance to breakdown), and water-stable aggregate size distribution, expressed as a mean weigh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When averaged across years, seasons, and treatments, MWD at 0 to 5 mm was 1.07 mm, significantly less (P<0.033) than the 1.21 mm at 5 to 50 mm. Tillage, cultivation, early-season sprinkler droplet kinetic energy, repeated freezing and thawing, or any combination of these or other factors could have accounted for MWD, or other measures of soil structure, being less near the surface than at depth (Bullock et al, 1988;Lehrsch, 1998;Lehrsch and Kincaid, 2006).…”
Section: Radish Effects On Soil Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When averaged across years, seasons, and treatments, MWD at 0 to 5 mm was 1.07 mm, significantly less (P<0.033) than the 1.21 mm at 5 to 50 mm. Tillage, cultivation, early-season sprinkler droplet kinetic energy, repeated freezing and thawing, or any combination of these or other factors could have accounted for MWD, or other measures of soil structure, being less near the surface than at depth (Bullock et al, 1988;Lehrsch, 1998;Lehrsch and Kincaid, 2006).…”
Section: Radish Effects On Soil Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As summer progressed, repeated cultivation may have fractured larger but weaker aggregates to yield smaller but more stable aggregates, thus reducing MWD but increasing aggregate stability. This fracturing process or other temporal responses of Portneuf aggregates greater than and/or smaller than those analyzed for aggregate stability may have accounted for this surprising finding (Lehrsch and Kincaid, 2006). Also, the measurement of MWD, compared to stability, subjects aggregates to greater disruptive forces (Nimmo and Perkins, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic amendments also stimulate microbes to produce polysaccharides and other exudates that increase aggregate stability (Lehrsch 1995;Lehrsch et al 1991). Stable aggregates at and near the soil surface resist breakdown from raindrop or sprinkler droplet kinetic energy and sustain infiltration rates (Lehrsch and Kincaid 2001;2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second mechanism may have been a consequence of irrigation water droplet impact. In Study 2, the average 26% smaller tensile strength near the surface compared to the subsurface (Table 5) could have been due to sprinkler droplet kinetic energy fracturing a portion of the intra-aggregate, particle-to-particle bonds, thus weakening near-surface aggregates while having little or no effect on aggregates deeper in the profile (Lehrsch and Kincaid, 2006).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%