2003
DOI: 10.1007/bf02854316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sprout inhibition in storage: Current status, new chemistries and natural compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
80
1
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
80
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…An Environmental Protection Agency mandate (1996) within the requirements of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) resulted in a reduction in allowable CIPC residue, a chemical sprout inhibitor on fresh potatoes in the USA from 50 ppm to 30 ppm. This mandate coincides with tolerance reductions or restrictions for use of CIPC in other parts of the world (Kleinkopf et al 2003) with the European member countries having a limit of 5 to 10 ppm. Hence there is a need for alternative methods for sprout suppression, such as cold storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…An Environmental Protection Agency mandate (1996) within the requirements of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) resulted in a reduction in allowable CIPC residue, a chemical sprout inhibitor on fresh potatoes in the USA from 50 ppm to 30 ppm. This mandate coincides with tolerance reductions or restrictions for use of CIPC in other parts of the world (Kleinkopf et al 2003) with the European member countries having a limit of 5 to 10 ppm. Hence there is a need for alternative methods for sprout suppression, such as cold storage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…However, it has turned out to be difficult to predict physiological ageing of seed potatoes under different conditions (Johansen, Mollerhagen, & Haugland, 2008). Even though storage technologies have been developed and sprout inhibitors introduced to control the physiological state (Daniels-Lake & Prange, 2007) and sprouting, in particular, these attributes are difficult to control when seed potatoes are stored for longer periods (Kleinkopf, Oberg, & Olsen, 2003). This is the case in seed potato production areas in northern Finland (64.9 N,25.4 E): the growing season is short (120-180 days) and the storage period is relatively long (6-8 months).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potatoes stored in piles had uneven distribution of CIPC, presumably because of differential airflow within the piles (Conte et al 1995). Potato cultivars also differ in concentration of CIPC dose which is required for the effective control of sprout growth besides being influenced by storage conditions and temperatures (Kleinkopf et al 2003). All the factors and situations as described above play a role in leading to residue levels of CIPC in the treated potatoes during and after the period of storage.…”
Section: Adverse Consequences Of Sprouting Of Potatoes During Storagementioning
confidence: 99%