1998
DOI: 10.1109/24.756089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spurious exponentiality observed when incorrectly fitting a distribution to nonstationary data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asher and Hansen [2] point out the dangers of incorrectly identifying a non-exponential distribution as exponential. They suggest validating all data, understanding the nature of the data, performing a trend test after visually examining the data and, if there is no evidence of a trend , conducting an exponential goodness-of-fit test on the data before pronouncing it as 'exponential'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asher and Hansen [2] point out the dangers of incorrectly identifying a non-exponential distribution as exponential. They suggest validating all data, understanding the nature of the data, performing a trend test after visually examining the data and, if there is no evidence of a trend , conducting an exponential goodness-of-fit test on the data before pronouncing it as 'exponential'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure followed in determining the repairable system model is based on that suggested in [1] and [10]. The first step involves a graphical technique of plotting cumulative number of failures versus cumulative operating time .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in-depth use of this conceptual basis for practical cases can be found in Ascher and Hansen (1998) and Saldanha et al (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%