2001
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1101.abs
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sputum processing for evaluation of inflammatory mediators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies showed that large polyanionic DNA polymers present in the purulent secretions in CF patients electrostatically bind and sequester cationic granule proteins, such as neutrophil elastase and MPO (57,58). In line with these findings, we found that MPO released by neutrophils became immobilized to matrix extracellular DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Studies showed that large polyanionic DNA polymers present in the purulent secretions in CF patients electrostatically bind and sequester cationic granule proteins, such as neutrophil elastase and MPO (57,58). In line with these findings, we found that MPO released by neutrophils became immobilized to matrix extracellular DNA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Compared to other mediators, MPO concentration is greatly affected by the method used for its detection or for sputum sample processing [24][25][26], and sputum MPO concentrations have been reported to be extremely variable in different studies, with a large standard deviation [27]. In the samples in this study, an acceptable interassay coefficient of variation and a fairly good recovery of MPO were found, which, however, was lower in sputum induced by HS than in sputum induced by IS inhalation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…DNA was measured by microfluorimetry and compared with a calf thymus DNA standard (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 0.25 to 10.0 g/ml (22). The supernatant was diluted 1:50 for CF and 1:10 for ETT specimens with SSC solution (0.0154 M NaCl-0.015 M Na 3 -citrate, pH 7.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supernatant was diluted 1:50 for CF and 1:10 for ETT specimens with SSC solution (0.0154 M NaCl-0.015 M Na 3 -citrate, pH 7.0). One microliter of 33258 Hoechst (1.5ϫ 10 Ϫ6 M; (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) was added to the sample, and fluorescence was measured by spectrophotofluorimetry with an excitation wavelength at 360 nm and emission at 450 nm (22). Mucin degradation in vitro and by proteases with and without protease inhibitors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%