2016
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000002266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPY Imaging Use in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Patients: Preventative or Overly Conservative?

Abstract: Diagnostic, IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
37
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this hypothesis is hard to confirm, because objective measures of intraoperative skin flap quality or perfusion are still not available. Some progress has been made using fluorescence angiography. However, fluorescence angiography is not yet recommended as standard care, as at present it is not cost‐effective for use in all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this hypothesis is hard to confirm, because objective measures of intraoperative skin flap quality or perfusion are still not available. Some progress has been made using fluorescence angiography. However, fluorescence angiography is not yet recommended as standard care, as at present it is not cost‐effective for use in all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perfusion systems that guide intraoperative decisions have been advocated but may not always be available. 18 Implant visibility and rippling remains an issue that can be ameliorated but perhaps not always eliminated by fat grafting, despite more cohesive implants. Stability of the footprint of the reconstruction may be more problematic as it depends entirely on stabilization of the ADM pocket on the chest wall and may prove to be an issue with larger implants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These analyses can be done either in real time intraoperatively or post hoc. Mattison et al 54 used different thresholds to demonstrate that a higher cut-off value does not necessarily improve sensitivity and may even come at an increased cost in specificity, positive predictive value, and the unnecessary resection of as much as 10 cm 2 or more of skin. As they search for an accurate cut-off, some authors have advocated for the use of relative fluorescence in assessing perfusion, 55,56 but these measurements are more prone to interuser variability than absolute cut-offs.…”
Section: Indocyanine Greenmentioning
confidence: 99%