1999
DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1999.5458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Vulva in Brazil: Prognostic Importance of Host and Viral Variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
29
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is in agreement with previous studies that used different analytical techniques and demonstrated either no or only low prevalence of mucosal HPVs in these tumors. [4][5][6]12,13 Interestingly, two of four verrucous carcinomas in our study were found to be positive for HPV6. Since HPV6 is a low oncogenic risk HPV type, lesions caused by this HPV are not expected to show overexpression of p16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result is in agreement with previous studies that used different analytical techniques and demonstrated either no or only low prevalence of mucosal HPVs in these tumors. [4][5][6]12,13 Interestingly, two of four verrucous carcinomas in our study were found to be positive for HPV6. Since HPV6 is a low oncogenic risk HPV type, lesions caused by this HPV are not expected to show overexpression of p16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…12,13,15,54 The reasons for this apparent lack of correlation in some cases may be multifold: (1) the presence of mixed morphologic features in the different areas of the tumor, resulting in imprecise classification (eg presence of keratin pearls in basaloid carcinoma, presence of pseudokoilocytes or inconspicuous keratin pearls in keratinizing carcinoma); (2) detection of 'passenger HPV' resulting in non-correlating positive result of HPV detection and negative result of p16 INK4a staining; (3) failure of HPV DNA amplification resulting in noncorrelating negative result of HPV detection and positive result of p16 INK4a staining; (4) additionally, a recent study from our laboratory showed that false-positive interpretive error of 'blush' p16 INK4a immunostaining could result in a lack of correlation with detection of high oncogenic risk HPVs in cervical mucosa. 55 The overlapping histologic features in different tumor subtypes were analyzed in detail in a recent study by Santos et al 13 In the series of vulvar carcinomas described by Santos et al, keratin pearls were identified in over a half of basaloid carcinomas and in all warty and keratinizing carcinomas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4,5 Another complication is that various studies performed on head and neck and vulvar SCCs revealed a survival benefit for patients with a HPV-positive tumor, [8][9][10][11][12] whereas others failed to do so. [13][14][15] Also for penile SCC, 2 studies have been performed in which survival was correlated with the HPV-status of the primary tumor.These studies did not show survival differences between HPVpositive and HPV-negative tumors. 16,17 One of the possible explanations for the apparent discrepancies both in HPV prevalence rates and survival deals with the fact that sole HPV DNA detection might not be sufficient evidence of causation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%