“Squandered in Real Time”: How Public Management Theory Underestimated the Public Administration–Politics Dichotomy

Abstract

The United States places great emphasis on the public administration–politics dichotomy, but what happens to public management when the dichotomy breaks down? The authors critically evaluate the public management frameworks, New Public Management and New Public Governance, in the context of two major public management failures: the U.S. State of Illinois Budget Impasse during 2015–2017 and the COVID-19 Pandemic. A definition of public management failure is proffered, and both public management frameworks are found to have polarized and opposing views on whether process or outcome should have priority in crisis. We question whether the two major seminal theories in our field are still generalizable when their assumptions about the dichotomy and political neutrality are challenged in times of crises. The polarized perspectives were found to contribute to the public management failures. Ultimately, both frameworks were found to minimize the political influences that public administration and public management operate under, leaving a need for a more holistic and realistic framework.

Resiliency tactics during financial crisis: The nonprofit resiliency framework

“…The fiscal issues of the state remain, the process that allowed for the impasse was not altered, and human services delivery remains heavily dependent on state funding. Therefore, this may not be an isolated budgetary incident and we may see other crises impact human service delivery in similar ways (Young, Wiley, & Searing, 2020). Like individual giving, public funding has become a volatile source of income.…”

Reflecting on over 100 years of public administration education

“…One possible consequence of COVID 19 is that it has speeded up the broader public conversation about the role of government (Young et al 2020). Public Administration, both as a profession and a field of study or discipline, reflects this central dilemma: what is the role of public services and the appropriate role of public servants (at all levels of government)?…”

An Antiracist Index for State Level Assessment

“…Many still point to Woodrow Wilson and his 1887 work The Study of Administration as foundational. It has elicited lively debates in journals and classrooms about the legitimacy of the politics/administration dichotomy for decades (Stillman 1973; Martin 1988; Rutgers 1997; Young, Wiley and Searing 2020). While such deliberations are warranted, the literature has only recently acknowledged who Wilson was as a person—i.e.…”