Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Quantitative InfraRed Thermography 2014
DOI: 10.21611/qirt.2014.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Square pulse heating infrared thermography and shearography applied simultaneously on CFRP tissue bonded to reinforced concrete

Abstract: This study concern the use of a common thermal excitation for infrared thermography and shearographic measurements. The two NDT methods are used simultaneously to detect defects in the bonding between a concrete slab and a tissue of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP). Experimentation was conducted to evaluate defects depending on their size and simulated bonding quality. A numerical model was designed according to the experimental conditions. Obtained simulated results were compared with experimental data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques, including ultrasonic guided waves [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], electromagnetic waves (EW) [16,17], acoustic emission [18][19][20][21][22][23][24], infrared thermal imaging [25][26][27][28], fiber optic sensors [29][30][31][32][33][34][35], x-ray diffraction [36] and radar/microwave [37][38][39], are effective in structural damage detection. Although these methods can reflect the local damage state of the structure, they require complex and expensive instrument and professional interpretation, which makes it difficult to carry out real-time and on-line structure health monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, nondestructive testing (NDT) techniques, including ultrasonic guided waves [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], electromagnetic waves (EW) [16,17], acoustic emission [18][19][20][21][22][23][24], infrared thermal imaging [25][26][27][28], fiber optic sensors [29][30][31][32][33][34][35], x-ray diffraction [36] and radar/microwave [37][38][39], are effective in structural damage detection. Although these methods can reflect the local damage state of the structure, they require complex and expensive instrument and professional interpretation, which makes it difficult to carry out real-time and on-line structure health monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%