2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-018-5795-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Square texton histogram features for image retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the MIFH method with the color volume histograms [4], local binary pattern (LBP) [11], multi-texton histogram (MTH) [6], histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) [23], and BOW histogram [25]. Besides, we also compare the MIFH method with some extend methods which are derived from our previous works (the multitexton histogram [6] and the micro-structure descriptor [8]), including CPV-THF [43], STH [44], and CMSD [45] methods. In the comparison experiment, the vector dimensionality for the MIFH, LBPH, BOW, MTH, and CVH methods are 102, 256, 1000, 82, and 104 bins, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare the MIFH method with the color volume histograms [4], local binary pattern (LBP) [11], multi-texton histogram (MTH) [6], histogram of oriented gradients (HOG) [23], and BOW histogram [25]. Besides, we also compare the MIFH method with some extend methods which are derived from our previous works (the multitexton histogram [6] and the micro-structure descriptor [8]), including CPV-THF [43], STH [44], and CMSD [45] methods. In the comparison experiment, the vector dimensionality for the MIFH, LBPH, BOW, MTH, and CVH methods are 102, 256, 1000, 82, and 104 bins, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the comparison experiment, the vector dimensionality for the MIFH, LBPH, BOW, MTH, and CVH methods are 102, 256, 1000, 82, and 104 bins, respectively. e vector dimensionality for the CPV-THF [43], STH [44], and CMSD [45] methods are 242, 172, and 88 bins, respectively. In the HOG descriptor, there are nine bins with a block size of three and a cell size of six.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the performance of the proposed method, some state-of-the-art methods were selected for comparison: SoC-GMM [55], LDP [56], SSH [1], CPV-THF [57], and STH [58]. A distance metric and benchmark dataset were required for the comparisons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we compare the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods such as SSH [1], SoC-GMM [55], LDP [56], CPV-THF [57], and STH [58].…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In early studies, low-level features of images were usually extracted to classify scenes, such as color, texture, and shape [17][18][19]. However, these methods based on low-level features have not been a hot topic in the field of scene classification due to its unsatisfactory classification effect.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%