2005
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2005-00031-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Squeezed ?atomic? states, pseudo-Hermitian operators and Wigner D-matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of behaviour has also been noticed in the spin squeezing properties of pseuo-Hermitian operator discussed in Ref. [11]. This striking property of the spin squeezing operator persists for longer interaction times too.…”
Section: Systems With J >supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This type of behaviour has also been noticed in the spin squeezing properties of pseuo-Hermitian operator discussed in Ref. [11]. This striking property of the spin squeezing operator persists for longer interaction times too.…”
Section: Systems With J >supporting
confidence: 74%
“…The operators in Eqs. (11) are special cases of the Lipkin Hamiltonian. The S spin also appears in the Hamiltonian of a complex magnetic molecule in a static magnetic field [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relevance of pseudo-Hermitian operators to two-level atomic and optical systems has been noted in [27,26,204], and their application in describing squeezed states is elucidated in [73,25]. The optical systems provide an important arena for manufacturing non-Hermitian and in particular pseudo-and quasi-Hermitian effective Hamiltonians.…”
Section: Atomic Physics and Quantum Opticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in [167], this puts a severe restriction on the form of allowed time-dependent Hamiltonians. 73 We can certainly work in the Hermitian representation (H, h) of the system where h := ρ H ρ −1 (with ρ := √ η + ) is the equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian (59). In this representation the generating functional has the form…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%