2005
DOI: 10.1021/ic0505091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Squeezing the [Cu−OH···H2O−Cu]3+ Bridge by Cryptate Encapsulation

Abstract: Treatment of cryptand L(1) with Cu(II) generates a H3O2(-)-bridged dicopper(II) cryptate, 2, where the guest anion has responded to steric constraint by a significant shortening of the O-O distance to 2.325(9) A; computational optimization at the B3LYP/6-31(d) level suggests that the bridging O-H...O H-bond is bent (approximately 157 degrees) but that the barrier to interchange of the bridging H atom is low (<4 kJ mol(-1)). This cryptate, rather than the [Cu2L(1)muCN]3+ species recently claimed to derive from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[18] A recent communication, [19] the results of which, however, we have been unable to replicate, [20] reports quantitative conversion of MeCN to CN À within the analogous pxylene spaced dicopper cryptate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[18] A recent communication, [19] the results of which, however, we have been unable to replicate, [20] reports quantitative conversion of MeCN to CN À within the analogous pxylene spaced dicopper cryptate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The structures of 5 and [Co 2 L(OH)(OH 2 )] 3+ [9a] illustrate the axial flexibility of the cryptate ligand. The Cu ⋅⋅⋅ Cu and Co ⋅⋅⋅ Co distances of 7.013(1) Å in 5 and 6.482(2) Å in [Co 2 L(OH)(OH 2 )] 3+ are substantially longer than the Cu ⋅⋅⋅ Cu separation in [Cu 2 L(OH)(OH 2 )] 3+ (6.121(1) Å),8a that is, the Cu ⋅⋅⋅ Cu separation in [Cu 2 L] 4+ can be expanded to encapsulate different sizes of guest molecules within its cavity, and a squeezing effect does not exist in [Cu 2 L] 4+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The CuN (bridgehead) distances (1.991(5) and 1.999(5) Å) are close to the CuO distances (1.996(4) and 1.998(4) Å), which are shorter than the other CuN distances (2.098(5)–2.205(5) Å). The O1W ⋅⋅⋅ O2W distance of 3.032 Å is longer than the O1 ⋅⋅⋅ O1′ separation of 2.665(6) Å in [Co 2 L(OH)(OH 2 )] 3+ ,9a and much longer than the O1 ⋅⋅⋅ O1′ separation of 2.325(9) Å in [Cu 2 L(OH)(OH 2 )](ClO 4 ) 3 ( 6 ), in which the axial positions of the two Cu II ions are occupied by OH − and H 2 O, respectively 8a. The short O ⋅⋅⋅ O separation in [Cu 2 L(OH)(OH 2 )] 3+ was attributed to cryptate encapsulation squeezing the bridge 8a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2] Diese Beobachtung wurde allerdings von Nelson und Mitarbeitern infrage gestellt, da sie diese Ergebnisse trotz detaillierter Untersuchungen nicht reproduzieren konnten. [3] Unsere eigenen Studien an verwandten Kupfer-Komplexen [4] führen uns allerdings zu der Schlussfolgerung, dass Cyanid tatsächlich entstehen könnte, wenn die erforderlichen Reaktionsbedingungen exakt eingehalten werden (den postulierten Reaktionsmechanismus halten wir allerdings für falsch). Erst kürzlich wurde das Auftreten einer solchen Reaktion von Karlin et al nachgewiesen: Sie demonstrierten, dass ein zweikerniger Kupfer(I)-Komplex mit einem Phenol-Derivat des von uns bereits früher vorgestellten Liganden 1,3-Bis-[bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amino]benzol (1,3-tpbd) [5] während der Oxidation mit Sauerstoff eine Hydroxylierung des NitrilSubstrats unter Bildung von Cyanid und Aldehyd bewirkt.…”
unclassified