2020
DOI: 10.1063/1.5137820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SquidLab—A user-friendly program for background subtraction and fitting of magnetization data

Abstract: We present an open-source program free to download for academic use with full user-friendly graphical interface for performing flexible and robust background subtraction and dipole fitting on magnetization data. For magnetic samples with small moment sizes or sample environments with large or asymmetric magnetic backgrounds, it can become necessary to separate background and sample contributions to each measured raw voltage measurement before fitting the dipole signal to extract magnetic moments. Originally de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S3 online) 41,42 . Afterward, we undertook the susceptibility measurement to find that it exhibits a sizeable diamagnetic response below the room temperature, as shown in Figure 2a and 2b 43 (see also Supplementary Fig. S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S3 online) 41,42 . Afterward, we undertook the susceptibility measurement to find that it exhibits a sizeable diamagnetic response below the room temperature, as shown in Figure 2a and 2b 43 (see also Supplementary Fig. S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some measurement sets with the thin glass support, the background signals were subtracted off from the raw data to obtain the pure sample signals and to ensure that the significant signals were from the sample alone. The subtraction was done using the SquidLab software suite, which was developed to improve the fidelity of the signals during this project 43 . The magnetization was measured in two ways: the field sweeping at a specific temperature and the temperature sweeping with a particular applied field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A big challenge here is to subtract the sizable background contribution of the pressure cell from the measured signal. [106] Alternatively, measurements of the magnetic susceptibility by using an ac technique can be performed inside a pressure cell. Certainly, this technique is not as sensitive to small moments as the commercial superconducting quantum interference device (SQUID)-based MPMS, but it offers the possibility to measure frequency-dependent magnetic properties, which can be of relevance for, for example, spin glasses [107] and has the great potential for significant miniaturization, which is essential for application at even higher pressures.…”
Section: Measurement Probes Under Hydrostatic Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field was swept between -30,000 Oe and 30,000 Oe with one measurement point per 2500 Oe. All DC magnetic susceptibilities were corrected for diamagnetic contribution from the sample holder, and the solvent (water or salt aqueous solution) by directly subtracting their scaled voltage signals by weight and then fitting with a SquidLab program [17] . As the result, we can get the magnetization (M) versus magnetic field (H) curves, and compute the mass susceptibility (χ), χ = M/H=a/mH, where a is the moment measured by the SQUID magnetometer and m is the mass of the assembled peptide measured by a Nanophotometer TM P330 (Implen GmbH).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%