2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijcat.2013.055562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

srCE: a collaborative editing of scalable semantic stores on P2P networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, SU-Set relies on causal delivery of the underlying network, which is challenging and can pose problems in highly dynamic platforms. 32 Methods reviewed in this section are limited to sharing and synchronizing semantic stores without taking into consideration neither the OAC anatomy nor the collaborative annotation in a distributed manner. Therefore, a new CRDT for OAC is proposed as an extension to OAC data model in order to support not only the collaborative annotation aspect but also to enable concurrent annotations while guaranteeing CCI preservation criteria.…”
Section: Crdts For Collaborative Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, SU-Set relies on causal delivery of the underlying network, which is challenging and can pose problems in highly dynamic platforms. 32 Methods reviewed in this section are limited to sharing and synchronizing semantic stores without taking into consideration neither the OAC anatomy nor the collaborative annotation in a distributed manner. Therefore, a new CRDT for OAC is proposed as an extension to OAC data model in order to support not only the collaborative annotation aspect but also to enable concurrent annotations while guaranteeing CCI preservation criteria.…”
Section: Crdts For Collaborative Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Convergence: when the system is idle, all copies are identical. (iii) Intention: the expected effect of a delete and insert operation must be observed on all copies 32 . This means that for any operations, the effects of running an operation at all sites are the same as its intention, and the effect of running this operation does not change the effects of independent operations.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their main goal is to provide versioning to Linked Data, they do not consider any correctness criterion when networks of collaborators copy fragments from each other, and they do not allow fragmentation, i.e., the full repository needs to be copied each time. [10,25] use eventual consistency as correctness criterion. However, this requires that all updates to be eventually delivered to all participants, which is not compatible with fragmentation nor with socially-generated collaboration network.…”
Section: Experimentationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions have been extensively studied in Collaborative Data Sharing Systems (CDSS) [11], Linked Data with adaptations of DVCS [18,4] and replication techniques [10,25]. Existing approaches follow a total replication approach, i.e., full datasets or their full histories are completely replicated at each participant or they require coordination to maintain consistency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%