2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SSR fingerprinting Chinese peach cultivars and landraces (Prunus persica) and analysis of their genetic relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
44
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microsatellites have been extensively used in Prunus genetics investigations in the last decade Lacis et al, 2009;Cheng and Huang, 2009), and the number of microsatellite loci available particularly for Prunus genus has greatly increased. Microsatellite markers, being abundant, multiallelic, and highly polymorphic, provide an efficient and accurate means of detecting genetic polymorphism among fruit species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microsatellites have been extensively used in Prunus genetics investigations in the last decade Lacis et al, 2009;Cheng and Huang, 2009), and the number of microsatellite loci available particularly for Prunus genus has greatly increased. Microsatellite markers, being abundant, multiallelic, and highly polymorphic, provide an efficient and accurate means of detecting genetic polymorphism among fruit species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, their codominant nature makes them the markers of choice for population genetic analysis to assess genetic organization in germplasm collections. In Prunus, microsatellites have been used for germplasm characterization (Lacis et al, 2009), determination of genetic diversity (Wünsch, 2009), germplasm management (Cheng andHuang, 2009), parentage analysis (Yamamato et al, 2003), cultivar identification (Xuan et al, 2009), and mapping genetic linkage (Lalli et al, 2008). In Prunus, microsatellites developed in one species have been used in different species, demonstrating their transferability and ability to detect polymorphism (Wünsch, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers are more advantageous as they are not affected by the environment, can provide a powerful tool for proper characterization of cultivars, are more informative, and do not need extensive observations of mature plants. Various DNA-based markers have been recently developed and used for studies in genetic diversity, fingerprinting and cultivar origin (Fang et al, 2005(Fang et al, , 2006Cheng and Huang, 2009;D'Onofrio et al, 2009;Elidemir and Uzun, 2009;Melgarejo et al, 2009;Papp et al, 2010). Among the several markers available, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (William et al, 1990) is useful for cultivar analysis with major advantages in simplicity, efficiency, ease of operation, and non-requirement of any previous sequence information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers have the advantages of not being affected by the environment and being able to provide a powerful tool for proper characterization of cultivars. In recent years, various DNA-based markers have been developed and used for genetic diversity, fingerprinting studies and determination of the origins of cultivars (D'Onofrio et al, 2009;Melgarejo et al, 2009;Cheng and Huang, 2009;Elidemir and Uzun, 2009;Papp et al, 2010), of which random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Williams et al, 1990) markers are useful for cultivar analysis with specific advantages in simplicity, efficiency, and non-requirement of any previ-ous sequence information. If some optimization of the RAPD technique, by choosing 11-nt primers and strict screening of PCR annealing temperature for each primer, is done before it is employed in fingerprinting plants, RAPD can be a preferred technique in plant cultivar identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%