Öffentliche Finanzen Und Verhaltensökonomik 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-09913-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staatsausgaben und Verhaltensökonomik – Zur Psychologie der öffentlichen Ausgabentätigkeit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If lottery L2 is preferred to L1, adding another lottery should not change your preferences. At the same time, this axiom is the subject of the most severe criticism, primarily from economists and behavioral financiers, who undermine it very often and prove that it usually differs from the real conditions of decision-making (Ackert & Deaves, 2012;Döring, 2015;Kunreuther et al, 2013;Rejda & McNamara, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If lottery L2 is preferred to L1, adding another lottery should not change your preferences. At the same time, this axiom is the subject of the most severe criticism, primarily from economists and behavioral financiers, who undermine it very often and prove that it usually differs from the real conditions of decision-making (Ackert & Deaves, 2012;Döring, 2015;Kunreuther et al, 2013;Rejda & McNamara, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeśli preferuje się loterię L 2 względem L 1 , to dołączenie kolejnej loterii nie powinno zmienić preferencji. Aksjomat ten jednocześnie jest przedmiotem najostrzejszej krytyki przede wszystkim ze strony ekonomistów i finansistów behawioralnych, którzy podważają go bardzo często i dowodzą, że zazwyczaj odbiega od rzeczywistych warunków podejmowania decyzji (Ackert i Deaves, 2012;Döring, 2015;Kunreutheri in., 2013;Rejda i McNamara, 2016).…”
unclassified