2016
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilin-1 and Stabilin-2 are specific receptors for the cellular internalization of phosphorothioate-modified antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) in the liver

Abstract: Phosphorothioate (PS)-modified antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) have been extensively investigated over the past three decades as pharmacological and therapeutic agents. One second generation ASO, Kynamro™, was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and over 35 second generation PS ASOs are at various stages of clinical development. In this report, we show that the Stabilin class of scavenger receptors, which were not previously thought to bind DNA, do bind … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
140
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(72 reference statements)
3
140
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, one of the markers for SECs in zebrafish embryos and adult mammals, Stabilin-2, has been identified as the main HA clearance receptor in the mouse liver. 40 In vitro, Stabilin-2 and its paralog Stabilin - 1 have been shown to bind to a large variety of endogenous (mostly anionic) macromolecules 41 as well as phosphothiorate-modified antisense oligonucleotides (PS-ASO), 42 apoptotic cell bodies, 43 biotinylated albumin, 44 and carbon nanotubes. 45 In vivo , Stabilin-1 and Stabilin-2 were shown to mediate sequestration (but not uptake) by LSECs of aged erythrocytes in a phosphatidylserine-dependent manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, one of the markers for SECs in zebrafish embryos and adult mammals, Stabilin-2, has been identified as the main HA clearance receptor in the mouse liver. 40 In vitro, Stabilin-2 and its paralog Stabilin - 1 have been shown to bind to a large variety of endogenous (mostly anionic) macromolecules 41 as well as phosphothiorate-modified antisense oligonucleotides (PS-ASO), 42 apoptotic cell bodies, 43 biotinylated albumin, 44 and carbon nanotubes. 45 In vivo , Stabilin-1 and Stabilin-2 were shown to mediate sequestration (but not uptake) by LSECs of aged erythrocytes in a phosphatidylserine-dependent manner.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, clearance of PS-ASOs was recently shown to be dominated by Stab2 in the mouse liver. 42 To test the generality of stab2 function, several other polyanionic nanoparticles were injected in wild-type and stab2 ibl2 mutant embryos as well as following dextran sulfate injection (Figure 4a–l). These included endogenous (DOPS liposomes, a model for apoptotic cell fragments), viral (Cowpea Chlorotic Mottle Virus-like particles, CCMV VLPs), 53 polymeric (polymersomes 54 and polystyrene beads), and inorganic (quantum dots, QDs) nanoparticles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 The ASOs used in this study were fully modified with the phosphorothioate backbone modification and had a central gap region of ten DNA nucleotides flanked on either end with three constrained ethyl (cEt) nucleotides. 32,34 The phosphorothioate modification enhances ASO metabolic stability and promotes binding to plasma and cell surface proteins, 55 which helps the ASO distribute from the site of injection to peripheral tissues. The DNA gap region supports RNase H-mediated cleavage of cRNA, whereas the cEt nucleotides enhance ASO metabolic stability and boost binding affinity for cRNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The MBB designs were evaluated because they were expected to show lower nonspecific binding to membrane proteins as compared to ASOs with full PS designs. 28 Both, the MBB2 and MBB3 ASO-conjugates were able to displace 125 I-ASOR efficiently with inhibitory constants of 40 and 15 nM, respectively ( Fig. 2 and Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%