Stabilitätsnachweise nach EN 1993‐1‐5 – Theorie und Beispiele

Timmers, Ralph; Lener, Gerhard; Sinur, Franc; Kövesdi, Balázs; Chacón, Rolando

doi:10.1002/9783433605219.ch3

Cited by 3 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Validierung und Verifikation des numerischen Modells im Sinne von prEN 1993‐1‐14 Kapitel 6 erfolgen mit drei Methoden: Vergleich kritischer Beulspannungen des FE‐Modells mit Referenzwerten (LBA) Nachrechnung des Beispiels von Timmers et al (LBA + GMNIA) Nachrechnung der Versuche von Mensinger et al (GMNIA) …”

Section: Numerisches Modellunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Über den Einfluss der Torsionssteifigkeit von Längssteifen bei Beulfeldern unter biaxialen Druckspannungen

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stichworte Beulnachweis; Methode der reduzierten Spannungen; Torsionssteifigkeit; Längssteifen; mehrachsige Druckbeanspruchung; Stahlund Stahlverbundbrücken; Taktschiebeverfahren;DIN EN 1993-1-5 on the influence of the torsional stiffness of longitudinal stiffeners with panels under biaxial compression stresses During the incremental launching of steel and composite bridges, the superstructure's slender web plates are temporarily exposed to multiaxial compressive stresses. Along with longitudinal stresses due to the bending moment, there are transversal compressive stresses acting on the web at the launch bearings. Often, this construction stage is governing for the structure's design. In Germany, an analytical design approach for longitudinally stiffened webs requires the application of the reduced stress method of DIN EN 1993-1-5. Current investigations showed that if longitudinally stiffened plates with closed section stiffeners are exposed to uniaxial compression and the critical buckling stresses are calculated under consideration of the torsional stiffness of the longitudinal stiffeners, the method may lead to unsafe design results. Since November 2018, the rule to neglect the torsional stiffness in these cases has been introduced into the German National Annex to DIN EN 1993-1-5 and since October 2019 it is also part of DIN EN 1993-1-5. In a recent master thesis the effects of closed-section stiffeners with a high torsional stiffness on the structure's failure load and mode under multiaxial compression have been investigated. This was done by a numerical parametric study, where the findings have been compared to the design results of the reduced stress method of DIN EN 1993-1-5. Recommendations on design approaches have been developed.

show abstract

Section: Numerisches Modellunclassified

“…-Vergleich kritischer Beulspannungen des FE-Modells mit Referenzwerten (LBA) -Nachrechnung des Beispiels von Timmers et al [26] (LBA + GMNIA) -Nachrechnung der Versuche von Mensinger et al [4] (GMNIA)…”

Section: Modellverifikationunclassified

Über den Einfluss der Torsionssteifigkeit von Längssteifen bei Beulfeldern unter biaxialen Druckspannungen

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, the comparison of the buckling values leads to the conclusion that the model is verified for the linear buckling analysis The lowest ultimate stress from the own GMNIA calculation is 250𝑁/𝑚𝑚 2 and according to [17] this value is 271,9 𝑁/𝑚𝑚 2 . It should be noted that in [17], deviating from the rules of prEN 1993-1-5, the amplitude of the global imperfection was set to min(𝑎, 𝑏) / 200. In order to be able to compare the results, the imperfection amplitude of the own calculations was also adjusted accordingly.…”

Section: Validation and Verificationmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…The corresponding buckling values from [17] were compared with determined buckling values from own calculations and are listed in Table 2. It should be noted that the model in [17] does not provide precise information on the element size. Furthermore, the model in [17] was simulated with software ANSYS, so the deviations are still acceptable.…”

Section: Validation and Verificationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Buckling Resistance of Longitudinally Stiffened Panels with Closed Stiffeners under Direct Longitudinal Stresses

Pourostad

Kuhlmann

2022

ce papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The buckling behaviour of panels may be determined according to EN 1993‐1‐5 [1]. Most of the design rules relating to stiffened panels in EN 1993‐1‐5 were derived on the basis of open‐section stiffeners. Several recent investigations have shown that the application of the design rules according to EN 1993‐1‐5 [1] taking into account the torsional stiffness of the stiffeners may overestimate the resistance of the panels. Therefore, the recent Amendment A2 to EN 1993‐1‐5 states that the torsional stiffness of stiffeners should generally be neglected in determining critical plate buckling stresses. In addition, prEN 1993‐1‐5 [2] provides rules for considering the torsional stiffness of stiffeners. However, in this paper it will be shown that even the rules of prEN 1993‐1‐5 are not reliable as far as torsional stiffness is concerned. The paper focuses on the investigation of the buckling behaviour of stiffened panels with closed section stiffeners subjected to constant longitudinal compression stresses and shows improved rules to consider the torsional stiffness of the stiffeners. For this purpose, a new interpolation equation between column‐like and plate‐like behaviour is proposed, based on an extensive numerical parametric study. The proposal provides a safe and economic solution, as it considers the torsional stiffness of stiffeners when applying the rules of prEN1993‐1‐5.

show abstract

Buckling resistance of longitudinally stiffened panels with closed stiffeners under direct longitudinal stresses

Pourostad

Kuhlmann

2022

Steel Construction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The buckling behaviour of panels may be determined according to EN 1993-1-5 [1]. Most of the design rules relating to stiffened panels in EN 1993-1-5 were derived on the basis of opensection stiffeners. Several recent investigations have shown that the application of the design rules according to EN 1993-1-5 considering the torsional stiffness of the stiffeners may overestimate the resistance of the panels. Therefore, the recent Amendment A2 to EN 1993-1-5 states that the torsional stiffness of stiffeners should generally be neglected in determining critical plate buckling stresses. In addition, prEN 1993-1-5 [2] provides rules for considering the torsional stiffness of stiffeners. However, in this article it is shown that even the rules of prEN 1993-1-5 are not sufficient to overcome the safety deficiencies. The article focuses on the investigation of the buckling behaviour of stiffened panels with closed-section stiffeners subjected to constant longitudinal compression stresses. Improved rules have been developed that allow to consider the torsional stiffness of the stiffeners. Based on an extensive numeri cal parametric study, a new interpolation equation be tween column-and plate-like behaviour is proposed. In comparison to [3], the investigations have been extended to the effec tive width method. They show that the proposal provides a safe and economic solution for the reduced stress method and the effective width method when considering the torsional stiffness of stiffeners by calculating the critical plate buckling stresses.Keywords bridge design; plate-like behaviour; column-like behaviour; stiffened panel; longitudinal; reduced stress method; effective width method; torsional stiffness of stiffenerThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

show abstract

Stabilitätsnachweise nach EN 1993‐1‐5 – Theorie und Beispiele

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Über den Einfluss der Torsionssteifigkeit von Längssteifen bei Beulfeldern unter biaxialen Druckspannungen

Über den Einfluss der Torsionssteifigkeit von Längssteifen bei Beulfeldern unter biaxialen Druckspannungen

Buckling Resistance of Longitudinally Stiffened Panels with Closed Stiffeners under Direct Longitudinal Stresses

Buckling resistance of longitudinally stiffened panels with closed stiffeners under direct longitudinal stresses

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About