1980
DOI: 10.1021/ja00524a039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilities of stereoisomeric imine anions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Degree of "Syn--Effect" for the g-Substituents of (E)--Vinylic Sulfones Several explanations for the "syn-effect" or related phenomena have been proposed, [19][20][21][22][23] namely: (1) 6p-electron homoaromaticity, 21 (2) s-orbital (s s* or n s*) interaction, 20,22 (3) dipole-dipole (electrostatic) interaction including lone pair-lone pair repulsion, 19,20,21d,23 (4) intramolecular hydrogen bonding, 20 and (5) chelation 19 (see Figure 6). In order to reveal which explanation is most reasonable in the case of the isomerization of vinylic sulfones to allylic sulfones, we tried to determine the relative degree of the "syn-effect" for the various g-substituents by a series of experiments for g-monosubstituted 24b, 25 and g,gdisubstituted 25 vinylic sulfones including the time-course of the reactions.…”
Section: Relativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Degree of "Syn--Effect" for the g-Substituents of (E)--Vinylic Sulfones Several explanations for the "syn-effect" or related phenomena have been proposed, [19][20][21][22][23] namely: (1) 6p-electron homoaromaticity, 21 (2) s-orbital (s s* or n s*) interaction, 20,22 (3) dipole-dipole (electrostatic) interaction including lone pair-lone pair repulsion, 19,20,21d,23 (4) intramolecular hydrogen bonding, 20 and (5) chelation 19 (see Figure 6). In order to reveal which explanation is most reasonable in the case of the isomerization of vinylic sulfones to allylic sulfones, we tried to determine the relative degree of the "syn-effect" for the various g-substituents by a series of experiments for g-monosubstituted 24b, 25 and g,gdisubstituted 25 vinylic sulfones including the time-course of the reactions.…”
Section: Relativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…maticity seemed to be the most reasonable origin of the "syn-effect" among the several proposed explanations (Figures 6 and 7). [19][20][21][22][23] Namely, (1) 6p-electron homoaromaticity 21 was applicable to all of the g-substituents examined above except the cases such as i-propyl (30f), t-butyl (30g), and phenyl (30h) groups, which afforded (E)-allylic sulfones predominantly or exclusively (Table 3).…”
Section: Relativementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 Thus, we presumed that the enantioselectivity in eq 1 derives from a well-defined chiral aggregate, 2 , composed of the dilithium enediolate and the chiral dilithium amide. 11,14 The optimized conditions suggested a 1:1 stoichiometry, although that assertion lacked direct support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the syn orientation of the carbanionic center and the N-alkyl substituent in the lithiated Schiff base is more favorable from the viewpoint of thermodynamics, and C-alkylation of the lithium derivative is kinetically preferred. The syn configuration of lithiated and alkylated imines was confirmed by ab initio calculations [7], NMR data [8], and studies on the stereochemistry of α-alkylation of various lithiated Schiff bases [9][10][11]. For example, Frazer et al [8] performed 13 C NMR monitoring of α-alkylation of metalated Schiff bases derived from cycloalkanones and detected only unstable syn-alkylated species, while Smith et al [9] observed formation (96%) of a very unstable synalkylated Schiff base in the methylation of a metalated butyraldehyde imine derivative.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%