2016
DOI: 10.18805/lr.v0iof.11185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis for various quantitative traits in soybean [Glycine max (L.) merrill]

Abstract: The present investigation was carried out to study stability performance over twelve environments for yield and yield contributing characters in twenty two genetically diverse genotypes of soybean using a randomized complete block design. The partitioning of (environment + genotype x environment) mean squares showed that environments (linear) differed significantly and were quite diverse with regards to their effects on the performance of genotypes for yield and its components. Stable genotypes were identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand the rest of environments were revealed low genetic stability in their interaction using the previous soybean entries. Accordingly, we note that the genotypes; (Crawford, Giza 21, Giza 22, Giza 35, Giza 83, Giza 111) were the most genetic stability entries and recommended for using it under different environments, while the cultivar (Giza 82) coming in the second rank, Gill and Kumar (1989), Mohan and Har Ram (2006), Vera et al, (2013), Popovic et al, (2013), Dewi et al, (2014), Lemes et al, (2015), Lodhi et al, (2015), Hamawaki et al, (2015), Gunjan et al, (2016), Silva et al, (2016) and Tiwari et al, (2016).…”
Section: Stability Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand the rest of environments were revealed low genetic stability in their interaction using the previous soybean entries. Accordingly, we note that the genotypes; (Crawford, Giza 21, Giza 22, Giza 35, Giza 83, Giza 111) were the most genetic stability entries and recommended for using it under different environments, while the cultivar (Giza 82) coming in the second rank, Gill and Kumar (1989), Mohan and Har Ram (2006), Vera et al, (2013), Popovic et al, (2013), Dewi et al, (2014), Lemes et al, (2015), Lodhi et al, (2015), Hamawaki et al, (2015), Gunjan et al, (2016), Silva et al, (2016) and Tiwari et al, (2016).…”
Section: Stability Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%