1991
DOI: 10.1109/9.76367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis of a continuous implementation of variable structure control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, controller (8) still su!ers from chattering. Boundary-layer can be implemented if the sgn( * ) is substituted for a saturation sat( * ) function in (8), in which case the invariant condition is not satis"ed, however it renders tracking with guaranteed precision, Reference [5]. Note that thanks to the workless forces A, dissipativity arises for a storage function <, and observe that there does not exist, for this parametrization, an additional smooth control input to (8) that can satisfy the invariant condition.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, controller (8) still su!ers from chattering. Boundary-layer can be implemented if the sgn( * ) is substituted for a saturation sat( * ) function in (8), in which case the invariant condition is not satis"ed, however it renders tracking with guaranteed precision, Reference [5]. Note that thanks to the workless forces A, dissipativity arises for a storage function <, and observe that there does not exist, for this parametrization, an additional smooth control input to (8) that can satisfy the invariant condition.…”
Section: Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the controller still switches discontinuously around the vicinity of the boundary-layer and it may su!er from high frequency inside the domain of the boundary-layer and around the ideal sliding surface. Since this approach does not render the Coulomb-friction e!ect, then it yields a quasi-sliding mode instead of a sliding mode with ultimately bounded stability, see References [5,6]. The tracking errors introduced by this method cannot be further eliminated, unless feedback gains and bandwidth are increased, which are not always possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 1 shows the estimates for the (18) is discontinuous which may result in chattering. In the simulation, the discontinuous function (19) has been replaced by the saturation function to avoid chattering [5]. It should be noted that in the simulation example, the matrix Ξ(·) is chosen as [0.14 0.1346](1 + 1 u ) due to the term θu in (47), which may result in large gain in the adaptive law (20) when u is very small.…”
Section: An Application Example-bioreactormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the surface is mostly related to some stabilization problem: The shape of the surface is selected a priori, leading to a set of parameters that are to be computed (adjusted) in order to obtain the desired dynamics (El-Ghezaoui et al, 1983;Esfandiari and Khalil, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%