52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis of nonlinear networked control systems with asynchronous communication: A small-gain approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conditions (8)- (9) imply that the systemẋ = f (x, e) is L 2 -gain stable from (W y , W u ) to (H y , H u , δ y , √ δ u ). This robustness property is useful to interpret the interconnection between the x-system and the e-system.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conditions (8)- (9) imply that the systemẋ = f (x, e) is L 2 -gain stable from (W y , W u ) to (H y , H u , δ y , √ δ u ). This robustness property is useful to interpret the interconnection between the x-system and the e-system.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This robustness property is useful to interpret the interconnection between the x-system and the e-system. Indeed, condition (9) suggests that the x-system is affected by the esystem through the input (W y (e y ), W u (e u )) and similarly the e-system is affected by the x-system via the output (H y , H u , δ y , √ δ u ). This interpretation was originally proposed in [11] in the context of time-triggered control.…”
Section: Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads to a very systematic and modular setup, since when changing one subsystem, one only needs to find the ISS gains related to the changed subsystem in order to redo the stability analysis. Another advantage of the new approach is that it is much more general than the approach of [10], which makes it much easier to extend the results to more general control setups, to include other network-induced phenomena (e.g., quantization, transmission delays, packet losses, etc. ), and even to include different types of communication networks, such as perhaps event-triggered networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [10], we derive MATIs for each local network using a small-gain approach in order to guarantee closed-loop stability. In this paper we tackle a similar problem, but we take a different approach and make use of a small-gain theorem for general networks of interconnected (hybrid) systems which are input-to-state stable (ISS), developed in [3,4], to derive network parameters for each local network, which guarantee ISS of the complete system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%