2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1764-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability analysis of turning process with tailstock-supported workpiece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes the described approach a significant generalization and an extension to prior works [7,9,[13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Identification Of Stability Lobesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This makes the described approach a significant generalization and an extension to prior works [7,9,[13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Identification Of Stability Lobesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] different geometries of the workpiece corresponding to different machining stages were taken into account but no position-dependent dynamics was calculated. The authors of [13][14][15][16] studied the stability in turning with and without tailstock-supported workpiece. However, their methods are restricted to a specific number of modes along one spatial direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 From the results, they observed that using Magneto rheological fluid damper, tool vibration can be reduced and cutting performance can be improved effectively. Sekar et al 20 presented stability analysis in turning process with a coupled dynamic model of cutting tool and tailstock supported workpiece. The effect of the cutting position, workpiece dimensions, cutter flexibility, and cutter damping on the dynamic stability was presented with the dynamic model and they observed that the experimental chatter establishes the stable states accurately in rough turning operations for the proposed model.…”
Section: Kwok Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flexible workpiece which is supported only at one end undergoes elastic deformation reducing allowable depth of cut in the process [17]. Sekar et al [18] considered the effects of deflections of a tailstock-supported workpiece and presented a compliant 2DoF dynamic cutting force model by considering the relative motion of the workpiece with the cutting tool. It was found that when a slender and flexible workpiece is being cut, the critical chip width at higher speeds is considerably larger than a rigid workpiece.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%