2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and carbon isotope changes of soot and char materials during thermal oxidation: Implication for quantification and source appointment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies (e.g., Sharma et al, 2012;Han et al, 2007) show that most carbon black samples are somewhat more thermally refractory than diesel soot, which in turn seems to be more refractory than soot from wood burning, at least with respect to the thermal-chemical oxidation method (Song et al, 2012). Therefore, the carbon black experiments can give a reasonable estimate for the loss of more refractory types of soot, but it must be kept in mind that some types of soot or char can be less refractory than carbon black.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies (e.g., Sharma et al, 2012;Han et al, 2007) show that most carbon black samples are somewhat more thermally refractory than diesel soot, which in turn seems to be more refractory than soot from wood burning, at least with respect to the thermal-chemical oxidation method (Song et al, 2012). Therefore, the carbon black experiments can give a reasonable estimate for the loss of more refractory types of soot, but it must be kept in mind that some types of soot or char can be less refractory than carbon black.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Premature loss of EC results in a lower yield of EC, which might make 14 C analysis difficult. Since soot from burning biomass seems to be slightly less refractory than soot from fossil fuel burning, it is more easily lost in step S2, which will affect the source apportionment of EC (e.g., Han et al, 2007;Song et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012).…”
Section: U Dusek Et Al: Evaluation Of a Two-step Thermal Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the use of too harsh oxidation methods that allow only the most refractory part of RC to be recovered have the disadvantage that biomass burning soot is likely selectively lost. Biomass burning soot is less refractory than soot from liquid fuels (e.g., Song et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012) and has been found to evolve together with chars during thermal treatments rather than with diesel soot. Selective removal of biomass burning soot thus artificially decreases F 14 C (RC e ) which leads to an underestimate of the fraction modern of RC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Premature loss of RC results in a lower yield of RC, which might make 14 C analysis difficult. Since soot from burning biomass seems to be slightly less refractory than soot from fossil fuel burning, it is more easily lost in step S2, which will affect the source apportionment of RC (e.g., Han et al, 2007;Song et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012). The goal of this research is to thoroughly evaluate a separation method for OC and EC based on the THEODORE method that was first proposed by Szidat et al (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%