2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and change in children’s division strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
46
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple additions involving large numbers are more difficult than additions of smaller numbers, an effect that was replicated for subtractions, multiplications, and divisions [19]. However, the present study showed that the number of processing steps in the algorithm explicitly taught in French classrooms is a better predictor of the difficulty of divisions than the number of digits or the magnitude of the numbers involved in the problems.…”
Section: The Number Of Processing Stepscontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simple additions involving large numbers are more difficult than additions of smaller numbers, an effect that was replicated for subtractions, multiplications, and divisions [19]. However, the present study showed that the number of processing steps in the algorithm explicitly taught in French classrooms is a better predictor of the difficulty of divisions than the number of digits or the magnitude of the numbers involved in the problems.…”
Section: The Number Of Processing Stepscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…While some authors suggest that multiplication (e.g., 6 x 8=48) and division (e.g., 48/6=8) facts are stored and retrieved as independent representations [13,14], others proposed that multiplication could be used as a check after direct retrieval of the quotient [15][16][17]. For children, the results of the sole longitudinal study in 8 year old children were more in line with the idea of a shared memory network for multiplication and division facts [18], and in accordance with this idea, Robinson et al [19] observed that multiplication is the predominant strategy to solve simple division between Grade 5 and 7. The impact of multiplicative facts knowledge would be magnified in long division, because most of the long divisions need multiple and successive retrievals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current study focuses on the first three of these aspects, on the domain of multidigit arithmetic. In the domain of elementary or simple arithmetic, strategy use has been studied extensively: in elementary addition and subtraction (e.g., Carr & Jessup, 1997;Carr & Davis, 2001;Torbeyns, Verschaffel, & Ghesquière, 2004, 2005, in elementary multiplication (e.g., Anghileri, 1989;Imbo & Vandierendonck, 2007;Lemaire & Siegler, 1995;Mabbott & Bisanz, 2003;Mulligan & Mitchelmore, 1997;Sherin & Fuson, 2005;Siegler, 1988b), and in elementary division (e.g., Robinson et al, 2006). By contrast, research on solution strategies in complex or multidigit arithmetic problems is less extensive, but there is a growing body of studies in multidigit addition and subtraction (e.g., Beishuizen, 1993;Beishuizen, Van Putten, & Van Mulken, 1997;Blöte al., 2001;Torbeyns, Verschaffel, & Ghesquière, 2006) and in multidigit multiplication and division (e.g., Ambrose, Baek, & Carpenter, 2003;Buijs, 2008;Hickendorff, Heiser, Van Putten, & Verhelst, 2009;Hickendorff & Van Putten, 2012;Hickendorff, Van Putten, Verhelst, & Heiser, 2010;Van Putten, Van den Brom-Snijders, & Beishuizen, 2005).…”
Section: Solution Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is less demanding to increase multiplication eYciencies than to increase addition eYciencies. Strategy selection and strategy eYciency processes in other arithmetic operations (such as subtraction and division) have been investigated less frequently (but see Campbell & Xue, 2001;Imbo & Vandierendonck, 2007b, c;Robinson et al, 2006;Seyler et al, 2003) and are an issue for further research.…”
Section: Diverences Between Addition and Multiplicationmentioning
confidence: 99%