2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and change in personality and personality disorders

Abstract: In this paper we review recent findings related to stability and change in personality and personality disorder. Estimates of stability vary depending on a number of methodological and substantive factors.These factors include the type of stability being examined, the type of construct being assessed, the method being used to assess personality, how participants are sampled, and developmental trends in personality stability and change. We describe current evidence about personality stability with respect to ea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamics of PDs can be examined at different time scales, nomothetically or idiographically, and across or within situations (Hopwood, 2018; Hopwood, Zimmermann, Pincus, & Krueger, 2015; Ringwald, Woods, et al, 2020). First, the long‐term development of PDs, for example, the stability of pathological traits and symptoms, is of theoretical and practical relevance (e.g., Hopwood et al, 2013; see also Hopwood & Bleidorn, 2018 for a review). Second, some PDs can be defined by dysfunctional patterns of within‐person variability across situations.…”
Section: Personality Dynamics In Applied Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of PDs can be examined at different time scales, nomothetically or idiographically, and across or within situations (Hopwood, 2018; Hopwood, Zimmermann, Pincus, & Krueger, 2015; Ringwald, Woods, et al, 2020). First, the long‐term development of PDs, for example, the stability of pathological traits and symptoms, is of theoretical and practical relevance (e.g., Hopwood et al, 2013; see also Hopwood & Bleidorn, 2018 for a review). Second, some PDs can be defined by dysfunctional patterns of within‐person variability across situations.…”
Section: Personality Dynamics In Applied Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PDs (and pathological traits as described in the AMPD) have demonstrated long-term stability across individuals (i.e. rank order, mean-level change) (Morey and Hopwood, 2013; Wright et al ., 2015 b ; Hopwood and Bleidorn, 2018), expressions of PDs and pathological traits exhibit short-term fluctuation within individuals (Wright et al ., 2015 a ; Wright and Simms, 2016). Indeed, the person-specific, dynamic nature of PDs is key to treatment, as clinicians seek to understand the mechanisms of symptom expression to determine when and how to interrupt these processes for a unique individual (Wright and Hopwood, 2016).…”
Section: Structuring Dimensionality: Temporal Network Approaches To Personalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of basic personality traits over the life cycle, and their changes due to negative life events like cancer, has been under discussion [ 4 , 8 , 21 ]. We found no increased prevalence of neuroticism in OCSs compared to controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Checking several databases, we have not found any more studies examining the impact of neuroticism on health problems among OCSs. However, recent studies have documented that basic personality traits can be modified by severe traumatic life events like rape, robbery, or cancer [ 4 , 21 ]. According to these findings, OCSs could be expected to have higher prevalence of high neuroticism than cancer-free controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%