2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00123.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and change of attachment representations during emerging adulthood: An examination of mediators and moderators of change

Abstract: Using Bartholomew’s model of attachment (K. Bartholomew, 1990; K. Bartholomew & L. Horowitz, 1991), we explored stability and change of attachment in a group of young adults graduating from university and examined reasons for change of attachment. Consistent with previous research, we found that attachment dimensions were moderately stable; however, several variables predicted change. We explored the effect of changing relationship status and parental divorce on attachment and found that individuals who remain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scharfe (2003), in a review, found that approximately 60%-70% of participants maintained attachment styles and 30%-40% reported change in attachment style when measured across various time periods. However, little research has examined reasons for change in adult attachment styles, although some support has been found for an association between change in attachment style and change of relationship status (Scharfe & Cole, 2006). This finding in relation to betrayal trauma may provide evidence that betrayal trauma history may be another variable that is associated with a higher likelihood of differing attachment styles across different relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Scharfe (2003), in a review, found that approximately 60%-70% of participants maintained attachment styles and 30%-40% reported change in attachment style when measured across various time periods. However, little research has examined reasons for change in adult attachment styles, although some support has been found for an association between change in attachment style and change of relationship status (Scharfe & Cole, 2006). This finding in relation to betrayal trauma may provide evidence that betrayal trauma history may be another variable that is associated with a higher likelihood of differing attachment styles across different relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Complete T1 and T2 data was obtained from 73 participants (21 males, 52 females). There were no significant differences between students at different schools (d's ranging from 0.04 to 0.20) and no differences on T1 variables between participants who returned and those who did not return T2 questionnaires (d's ranging from 0.02 to 0.30) on any of the measured variables (see Scharfe & Cole, 2006). Effect sizes for both analyses indicated that differences between the groups were quite small.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As reported in Scharfe and Cole (2006), participants were 109 undergraduate seniors with a mean age of 21.89 (SD = 1.22; median age 22) from two liberal arts post-secondary institutions: one in Ontario, Canada (n = 53) and one in Western New York State (n = 56). Sixty-two percent of the participants were female, 94% were Caucasian, and 57% were in an exclusive romantic relationship.…”
Section: Methods Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RQ has been used widely and scores have been found to be moderately stable (e.g., Scharfe & Bartholomew, 1998), although the transparent nature of the instrument is thought to bias responses in some cases (Yusof & Carpenter, 2012). In addition, the strength of attachment avoidance was measured by adding ratings for the fearful and dismissing attachment patterns and subtracting ratings for secure and preoccupied attachment patterns, based on a model presented by Scharfe and Cole (2006). Similarly, the strength of attachment anxiety was measured by adding ratings for the fearful and preoccupied attachment patterns and subtracting ratings for secure and dismissing attachment patterns.…”
Section: Attachment Styles (Self-concept and Other-concept)mentioning
confidence: 99%