1976
DOI: 10.1177/001316447603600230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and Concurrent Validity of the Rotter Internal-External Locus of Control Scale

Abstract: A high school population ( N = 541) was administered the Rotter Locus of Control Scale in April and again the following November. At the second testing the MacDonald-Tseng and Rotter InternalExternal Locus of Control Scales were given to examine their concurrent validity.Test-retest reliability of the Rotter Scale was determined. Concurrent validity between the Rotter and MacDonald-Tseng scale (as the criterion measure) was established.EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT 1976, 36, 473-475. THE socia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since, unlike Rotter's scale, the scores on the VLOC scale are attributed to internal answers, a moderate and negative correlation (r = -.40, p < .05) was considered as an additional indication of validity. These VLOC Scale score correlations were comparable to correlations obtained in other studies of this type such as the Macan et al (1996) study (r = .29 for internal LOC and r = .49 for external LOC); the Spector (1992) study, r = .54; the Robertson et al (1990) study, r = .30; the study by Zerega, Tseng, and Greever (1976), r = .42; and the Levenson (1981) study, r = .25 for P, r = .56 for C, and r = .41 for I. 84 …”
Section: Conceptual Validitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Since, unlike Rotter's scale, the scores on the VLOC scale are attributed to internal answers, a moderate and negative correlation (r = -.40, p < .05) was considered as an additional indication of validity. These VLOC Scale score correlations were comparable to correlations obtained in other studies of this type such as the Macan et al (1996) study (r = .29 for internal LOC and r = .49 for external LOC); the Spector (1992) study, r = .54; the Robertson et al (1990) study, r = .30; the study by Zerega, Tseng, and Greever (1976), r = .42; and the Levenson (1981) study, r = .25 for P, r = .56 for C, and r = .41 for I. 84 …”
Section: Conceptual Validitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These results concerning the development of different aspects of domain-specific locus of control in adolescence confirm that different dimensions of control orientations show different developmental patterns-a result, which has been observed in recent studies in adulthood and old age (see Krampen, 1987b;Lachman, 1986) and cross-sectionally in adolescence (Connell, 1985). Such results have not been demonstrated longitudinally in adolescence, where research up to now has included only one-dimensional measures of locus of control (Prawatt, Jones & Hampton, 1979;Zerenga, Tseng & Greever, 1976).…”
Section: Cross-sequential Findingssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As the hypotheses of the present study relate to an internal locus of control, numbers of internal statements were calculated for each individual and analyzed, producing a measure of internal locus of control for each participant. Numerous studies have supported the validity, stability, and accuracy of this measure vis-a`-vis its psychometric properties (see Zerega, Tseng & Greever, 1976). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%