2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and surgical complications of tooth-borne and bone-borne appliances in surgical assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, devices fixed onto teeth, directly to the bone or hybrid fixation appliances are used. Each type of expander has its supporters and opponents [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, devices fixed onto teeth, directly to the bone or hybrid fixation appliances are used. Each type of expander has its supporters and opponents [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study employed the same risk of bias scale utilized in a prior systematic review [13] investigating the complications of SARPE to evaluate the strength of evidence presented in each of the studies included in the analysis. The evaluation criteria comprised a range of factors that are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Risk Of Bias/quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, after undergoing a comprehensive assessment based on the predetermined inclusion criteria, a total of 7 articles were deemed eligible and subsequently included in the final analysis [9,11,[14][15][16][17][18]. The other 19 articles were excluded due to the following reasons: nine lacked maxillary cephalometric measurements [8,13,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26]; three were focused on nonsurgical RPE [27][28][29]; three included patients with orthodontic tooth movement between the two time points of obtaining radiological images [10,30,31]; two were systematic reviews [32,33]; one was reported again in a later study by the same team [34]; and one was a case series with limited sample size [35]. The PRISMA flowchart of the article inclusion and exclusion screening is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Literature Searching and Study Selectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous systematic reviews investigated some complications after orthopaedic (ORME) or surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) (eg epistaxis, 17 teeth mobility or discoloration, 3,17,18 pain, 3,17,18 asymmetric or inadequate expansion, 3,17 gingival recession 18 and bone or root resorption 18‐20 ); however, there is no systematic review that summarized the existing evidence focussed on possible effects of RME on dental pulp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a recent systematic review has shown that orthodontic treatment cannot cause pulp necrosis, 16 only one eligible study of this previous review investigated the effects of RME on the dental pulp. 10 Previous systematic reviews investigated some complications after orthopaedic (ORME) or surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) (eg epistaxis, 17 teeth mobility or discoloration, 3,17,18 pain, 3,17,18 asymmetric or inadequate expansion, 3,17 gingival recession 18 and bone or root resorption [18][19][20] ); however, there is no systematic review that summarized the existing evidence focussed on possible effects of RME on dental pulp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%