2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2015.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability and synchronization of coupled Rulkov map-based neurons with chemical synapses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…β syn and σ syn are coefficients of chemical synaptic coupling [Hu and Cao, 2016], and I syn n is a synaptic current (1)…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…β syn and σ syn are coefficients of chemical synaptic coupling [Hu and Cao, 2016], and I syn n is a synaptic current (1)…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive studies [13][14][15][16][17][18] proved that discrete neuron models, especially the Rulkov neuron, could more effectively mimic the real behaviors of biological neurons. On this foundation, Cao et al [19][20][21][22][23] disclosed two identical Rulkov neurons coupled with chemical and electrical synapses, respectively, and reported the influence of the coupling strength on synchronization in detail. By constructing a small-world network made up of Rulkov neurons, Ferrari et al [24] proposed the idea of using delayed feedback to suppress synchronization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many applications of single-neuron models already exist, but it seems that a systematic study of their response as a function of the control parameters lack. Map-based models are easier to treat and analyze and have been used to describe specific situations, especially when considering coupled elements characterized by chemical [28,29], electrical [30,31] or both aspects [32][33][34][35]. The topology of neural networks is also an essential player in their dynamical behavior, as reported for, e.g., scalefree [32], global [36], mean-field [37], small world [38], and Apollonian [39,40] networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%