2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/7357320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability Control and Quick Retaining Technology of Gob‐Side Entry: A Case Study

Abstract: In Chinese coal mines, gob-side entry retaining, an efficient technique for coal mining, has been widely used. However, severe roadway deformation and slow retaining speed have gravely restricted the popularization and its application. Hence, in order to solve the existing problems, the deformation mechanism of gob-side entry was studied. Then, a new approach for gob-side entry retaining technique (GERT) was proposed to increase the speed of gob-side entry retaining. Finally, the application effect of the new … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the residual bending moment of the beam fracture, M A , is much less than the bending moment occurring in the main roof, M O . By comparing the theoretical models for the fracture of the main roof at the gob side and at the solid coal side and Equations (10) and (17), obviously, the temporary support strength in the roadway when the fracture site of the main roof is at the solid coal side is greater than that required at the gob side; namely P 1 > P 3 . The fracture occurrs above the roadway; one end of block B is on the roadway, and there is no supporting force of the solid coal.…”
Section: Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the residual bending moment of the beam fracture, M A , is much less than the bending moment occurring in the main roof, M O . By comparing the theoretical models for the fracture of the main roof at the gob side and at the solid coal side and Equations (10) and (17), obviously, the temporary support strength in the roadway when the fracture site of the main roof is at the solid coal side is greater than that required at the gob side; namely P 1 > P 3 . The fracture occurrs above the roadway; one end of block B is on the roadway, and there is no supporting force of the solid coal.…”
Section: Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yan et al [20] proposed a roof-cutting mechanical model of gob-side entry retention with a roadside backfill body; the roof-cutting resistance and the width of the roadside backfill body were calculated. Luan et al [21] analysed the surrounding rock structure formed in gob-side entry retention by building a concrete wall beside the roadway; bolt, cable, steel pipe, and angle irons were used to reinforce the surrounding rock. Wu et al [22] presented a dynamic-equilibrium mechanical model of the main roof structure; the mechanisms of formation of different types of short cantilever rock beam structures were clarified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e main research contents involved in gob-side entry retaining include the law of surrounding rock activity, the interaction relationship between surrounding rock and support, the support in roadway, reinforcement support, and roadside support [12][13][14][15][16]. Around these contents, some experts and scholars studied the strata behavior law of gobside entry retaining in fully mechanized top coal caving [17,18], analyzed the main parameters and adaptability of gob-side entry retaining [19][20][21], and according to the laboratory test results, analyzed two kinds of roof breaking modes of gob-side entry retaining in fully mechanized top coal caving and their influence on surrounding rock deformation [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%