2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0632-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability Following Combined Orthodontic-surgical Treatment for Skeletal Anterior Open Bite – a Cephalometric 15-Year Follow-up Study

Abstract: Treatment of skeletal open bite via Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy appears to be a clinically successful procedure providing stable results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
31
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…About 12.5 per cent of patients experienced some relapse of the anterior OB and 2.5 per cent (1 out of 39 patients) had a negative OB at the follow-up examination. These results present higher stability than the results presented in the literature for surgical correction of AOpB (Bailey et al, 2004;Ding et al, 2007;Espeland et al, 2008;Stansbury et al, 2010;Teittinen et al, 2012) or conventional orthodontics with temporary anchorage devices (TADs) (Kuroda et al, 2007;Baek et al, 2010) and lower stability than the results presented for the crib appliance (Huang et al, 1990;Justus, 2001). By comparing the data of our sample to the data presented in a meta-analysis comparing stability of surgical versus non-surgical AOpB treatment (Greenlee et al, 2011), metaanalysis revealed the pre-treatment adjusted means of OB were −2.8 mm for the surgical and −2.5 mm for the nonsurgical groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…About 12.5 per cent of patients experienced some relapse of the anterior OB and 2.5 per cent (1 out of 39 patients) had a negative OB at the follow-up examination. These results present higher stability than the results presented in the literature for surgical correction of AOpB (Bailey et al, 2004;Ding et al, 2007;Espeland et al, 2008;Stansbury et al, 2010;Teittinen et al, 2012) or conventional orthodontics with temporary anchorage devices (TADs) (Kuroda et al, 2007;Baek et al, 2010) and lower stability than the results presented for the crib appliance (Huang et al, 1990;Justus, 2001). By comparing the data of our sample to the data presented in a meta-analysis comparing stability of surgical versus non-surgical AOpB treatment (Greenlee et al, 2011), metaanalysis revealed the pre-treatment adjusted means of OB were −2.8 mm for the surgical and −2.5 mm for the nonsurgical groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…For adult patients the main treatment approach for severe AOpB is often surgical. Stability was reported in about 75-85 per cent of the cases treated with different surgical procedures (Bailey et al, 2004;Ding et al, 2007;Espeland et al, 2008;Stansbury et al, 2010;Teittinen et al, 2012). Despite the relative stability of surgically corrected AOpB, orthodontic camouflage or conventional orthodontic treatment is usually preferred by the patients due to reduced risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das Zusammenspiel der verschieden dentalen, skelettalen und Weichteil-Faktoren bei der Rezidiventstehung wird in den Arbeiten von Ding et al [6] und Lo & Shapiro [24] betont. In der vorliegenden Untersuchung war es möglich, diese Parameter genauer zu eruieren und ihren Einfluss zu werten.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Only Ding et al [6] mention the pre-operative orthodontic therapy as one reason for relapse. But changes caused by the orthodontist (dental compensation or decompensation of the skeletal deviations) are key to making surgical repositioning possible.…”
Section: Diskussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include severity of AOB malocclusion prior to treatment, extractions of premolars, correction of open-bite with or without orthognathic surgery, or different methods of retention (4,5). Recently, many studies have been conducted to check the long-term stability of corrected AOB malocclusion (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). When we searched the literature, we came across two systematic reviews of case series studies conducted to assess the effectiveness of orthodontic and orthopedic treatment in AOB correction (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%