2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability impact of small delays in proportional–derivative state feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, apart from the usual engineering objection of using the 'noisy' acceleration signals in feedback loops, the control design of such systems requires additional care. The complexities of NFDEs have fuelled an enormous mathematical literature [7,[32][33][34]; however, there have been few practical applications (for notable exceptions, see recent studies [35][36][37][38]). Here, we show that the stability criteria for the NFDE that arises in the setting of an inverted pendulum stabilized by a corrective torque can be readily determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, apart from the usual engineering objection of using the 'noisy' acceleration signals in feedback loops, the control design of such systems requires additional care. The complexities of NFDEs have fuelled an enormous mathematical literature [7,[32][33][34]; however, there have been few practical applications (for notable exceptions, see recent studies [35][36][37][38]). Here, we show that the stability criteria for the NFDE that arises in the setting of an inverted pendulum stabilized by a corrective torque can be readily determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [1,2], it is shown that, if the system (5.11) is controllable, and det(A) = 0, then all the characteristic roots of the closed-loop system can be assigned at arbitrary positions in C \ {0}. However, results described in [30] indicate that stability of the state derivative feedback control may not be robust against small feedback delays. This issue is investigated in what follows.…”
Section: = (2 H)mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In [6,18,22] boundary controlled partial differential equations are described that lead to a closed-loop system of neutral type, where the delays in the model are particular linear combinations of (physical) feedback delays and delays induced by propagation phenomena. In [30,31] the robustness against small feedback delays of linear systems controlled with state derivative feedback is addressed, motivated by vibration control applications. There, the closed-loop system can again be written in the form (1.1), where the delays τ k are combinations of actuator and sensor delays in input and output channels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those approximations were based on low-pass filters, and it was found that most of the robustness benefits of SSD were then lost. It has also been shown that SSD controllers may be fragile, in the sense that arbitrarily small time delays may destroy stability [32], and that small uncertain feedback delays cannot always be safely neglected if state derivatives are used in the feedback [33]. This occurs when such delays lead to neutral, rather than retarded, DDE's.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%