2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of 2-D digital filters described by the Roesser model using any combination of quantization and overflow nonlinearities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital 2D Roesser model discussed in [8,12] is considered as []centerarrayηhk+1,larrayηvk,l+1=[]centerarrayOQhξhk,larrayOQvξvk,l+[]centerarrayHhdhk,larrayHvdvk,l, []centerarrayξhk,larrayξvk,l=[]centerarrayG11arrayG12arrayG21arrayG22[]centerarrayηhk,larrayηvk,l, where both independent variables in 2D systems belong to real field, that is, k , l ∈ ℜ, and satisfy k=false{0,1,0.1em,m+1false} and l=false{0,1,0.1em,n+1false}, η h ( k , l ) ∈ ℜ m and η v ( k ...…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Digital 2D Roesser model discussed in [8,12] is considered as []centerarrayηhk+1,larrayηvk,l+1=[]centerarrayOQhξhk,larrayOQvξvk,l+[]centerarrayHhdhk,larrayHvdvk,l, []centerarrayξhk,larrayξvk,l=[]centerarrayG11arrayG12arrayG21arrayG22[]centerarrayηhk,larrayηvk,l, where both independent variables in 2D systems belong to real field, that is, k , l ∈ ℜ, and satisfy k=false{0,1,0.1em,m+1false} and l=false{0,1,0.1em,n+1false}, η h ( k , l ) ∈ ℜ m and η v ( k ...…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark In contrast to the techniques discussed in literature so far [3‐24], the proposed approach focuses on the overflow oscillation‐free region realization for 2D discrete‐time systems (as expressed in ()), in addition to the stability analysis, as a novel idea to the best of authors' knowledge. Whereas, in the context of establishing overflow oscillation‐free regions, the work in [28] is limited to only 1D systems.…”
Section: Stability Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existence of such nonlinearities causes instability to the designed system (Butterweck et al, 1988; Claasen et al, 1976; Oppenheim and Schafer, 1975; Schlichtharle, 2000). Therefore, several researchers have studied the stability properties of digital filters with saturation arithmetic (Ahn, 2011, 2013a, b; Bose and Chen, 1991; Kar, 2007, 2010; Kar and Singh, 1998, 2005; Kokil, 2016; Kokil and Shinde, 2015; Kokil et al, 2012a, 2012b, 2016; Liu and Michel, 1992; Singh, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the so-called 2D modeling theory could be applied as an efficient analysis tool to deal with other problems; for example, elimination of overflow oscillations in 2D digital filters employing saturation arithmetic has been implemented be means of LMIs in [6], LMI-based stability analysis of 2D discrete systems described by the Fornasini-Marchesini (FM) second model with state saturation has been addressed in [7], ∞ filter design for 2D Markovian jump systems has been given in [8], and optimal guaranteed cost control of 2D discrete uncertain systems has been studied in [9], respectively. More recently, considering the fact that state saturation often appears in various 2D digital systems when its transfer function is implemented by a state-space model with the finite wordlength format, the problem of stability analysis of 2D state-space digital filters with saturation arithmetic has been deeply investigated in the literature [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and less conservative LMI-based stability criteria have been persistently obtained. However, it is worth noting that most of the above results are only for certain 2D systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%