2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03552-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of a Distributed Generation Network Using the Kuramoto Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that, with the exception of the inertial terms M iθi and the possibly non-unit coefficients D i , the power network dynamics (8)-(10) are a perfect electrical analog of the coupled oscillator model (1) with ω i ∈ {−P l,i , P m,i , P d,i }. Thus, it is not surprising that scientists from different disciplines recently advocated coupled oscillator approaches to analyze synchronization in power networks (Tanaka et al, 1997;Subbarao et al, 2001;Hill and Chen, 2006;Filatrella et al, 2008;Buzna et al, 2009;Fioriti et al, 2009;Simpson-Porco et al, 2013;Dörfler and Bullo, 2012b;Rohden et al, 2012;Dörfler et al, 2013;Mangesius et al, 2012;Motter et al, 2013;Ainsworth and Grijalva, 2013). The theoretical tools presented in this article establish how frequency synchronization in power networks depend on the nodal parameters (P l,i , P m,i , P d,i ) as well as the interconnecting electrical network with weights a ij .…”
Section: Electric Power Network With Synchronous Generators and Dc/amentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Notice that, with the exception of the inertial terms M iθi and the possibly non-unit coefficients D i , the power network dynamics (8)-(10) are a perfect electrical analog of the coupled oscillator model (1) with ω i ∈ {−P l,i , P m,i , P d,i }. Thus, it is not surprising that scientists from different disciplines recently advocated coupled oscillator approaches to analyze synchronization in power networks (Tanaka et al, 1997;Subbarao et al, 2001;Hill and Chen, 2006;Filatrella et al, 2008;Buzna et al, 2009;Fioriti et al, 2009;Simpson-Porco et al, 2013;Dörfler and Bullo, 2012b;Rohden et al, 2012;Dörfler et al, 2013;Mangesius et al, 2012;Motter et al, 2013;Ainsworth and Grijalva, 2013). The theoretical tools presented in this article establish how frequency synchronization in power networks depend on the nodal parameters (P l,i , P m,i , P d,i ) as well as the interconnecting electrical network with weights a ij .…”
Section: Electric Power Network With Synchronous Generators and Dc/amentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Indeed, the similarity between the Kuramoto model and the power network models used in transient stability analysis is striking. Even though power networks have often been referred to as coupled-oscillators systems, the similarity to a second-order Kuramoto-type model has been mentioned only recently in the power systems community in simulation studies for simplified models [25], [26], [27]. In the coupled-oscillators literature, second-order Kuramoto models have often been analyzed [20], but we know of only one article mentioning power networks [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via a singular perturbation analysis, we show that the transient stability analysis for the classic swing equations with overdamped generators reduces, on a long time-scale, to the problem of synchronizing non-uniform Kuramoto oscillators with multiple time constants, non-homogeneous coupling, and non-uniform phase shifts. This reduction to a non-uniform Kuramoto model is arguably the missing link connecting transient stability analysis and networked control, a link that was hinted at in [10], [12], [25], [26], [27], [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) We set normally-distributed {ω i } for each node. It is because that previous studies on real networks such as power grids and brain networks have assumed that the natural frequencies of belonging oscillators are symmetrically fluctuating around the averaged frequency [4,22,29].…”
Section: B Estimation Of the Mean Synchronization Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) First, we define the synchronization cost, S ij , due to phase difference between frequencysynchronized phase oscillators i and j in the Kuramoto model. We adopt the Kuramoto model because the model has been used as approximation of various systems including power grids [2, 21,22] and large-scale brain networks [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%