1968
DOI: 10.1177/001316446802800214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of Engineering Interests Over a Period of Four Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding interest stability in different academic environments, Gehman and Gehman (1968) distinguish three different engineering subjects, reporting stabilities from r = .444 to r = .616. However, the difference between these correlations was not significant, most plausibly caused by the low sample sizes between 23 and 37 students per subject.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence Of Interest Stability and Change Consider...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding interest stability in different academic environments, Gehman and Gehman (1968) distinguish three different engineering subjects, reporting stabilities from r = .444 to r = .616. However, the difference between these correlations was not significant, most plausibly caused by the low sample sizes between 23 and 37 students per subject.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence Of Interest Stability and Change Consider...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those given after 1960 may have had information returned to the takers as reported by Form D, that is, using a different kind of score and far fewer occupational scales. Some of the Duke University engineering students were given a second, follow-up administration (Gehman & Gehman, 1968), but to the investigator's knowledge, no other group was given a follow-up. It should be noted that the year of administration varies from 1954 to 1961, and that the age at administration is reflected by educational levels varying from Grade 8 to college senior.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%