Stability of Grazing Systems: An Application of Predator-Prey Graphs

Abstract

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Ecology. INTRODUCTIONIn a now classical paper, Rosenzweig & MacArthur (1963) have shown how the general stability properties of simple predator-prey systems can be studied by graphical techniques, supplemented by mathematical analysis of the behaviour near equilibrium points. A similar, graphical analysis of predation functions was suggested by Holling (1965). The stability analysis of predator and prey isoclines in the predator-prey 'phase diagram' has been discussed further by MacArthur & Connell (1966) and Rosenzweig (1969Rosenzweig ( , 1971). The mathematical and graphical analysis of stability in predator-prey systems, and even three-trophic-levels systems, have been extended by Canale . Thus a considerable body of theory has been developed to deal with systems of populations at two or more trophic levels, or 'exploitation' systems (Rosenzweig 1973). So far only few attempts (Salt 1967; Maly 1969; McAllister, Le Brasseur & Parsons 1972)have been made to apply this theory to real ecological systems, whether by directing experiments or observations to test it, or even by comparing its predictions with existing data. Partly this slowness in application may have been due to the feeling that these theoretical models are still too simplified to be expected to apply directly to the manyspecies, variable-environment and spatially heterogeneous predator-prey systems found in nature. However, as pointed out by Rosenzweig (1973), scientific theory often starts by testing rather simple models, even of complex systems.Grazing systems used and controlled by man, from intensive pastures to extensive range, may be considered as a special case of'predator-prey' systems. Much of the theory was developed with explicit or implicit reference to two animal populations (e.g. Rosenzweig & MacArthur 1963; Holling 1965). But herbivore ('predator')-plant ('prey') interaction is sufficiently similar in its general features to make the same approach useful. Some important modifications are necessary, on the basis of biological considerations, but some results are directly transferable between predator-prey and herbivore-plant systems. Grazing systems have some advantages as relatively simple test cases for general ecological theories: the number of species is limited (usually only one herbivore, in some cases one or a few plant species), environmental heterogeneity within a system is often low and movement of animals is controlled. There is a large and increasing number of observations and experiments on pasture and range systems in many parts of the world. On the other hand, grazing systems are ...

Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification

“…As a consequence mechanistic models can rarely be used to predict accurately non-linear phenomena in ecological systems, but they can still give qualitative predictions that could be useful to interpret observations. For example, simplified models of grazing interactions [5] or of desertification [7] allow understanding the availability of multiple stable states for ecosystems in terms of the classical image of a marble rolling down a rugged landscape [5], for which the final rest state varies with the initial condition.…”

“…Initial reports of kelp forest disturbance and recovery [2], freshwater ecosystem shifts engineered by beavers [3], and vegetation shifts affected by fire [4] have lead on to an ever-growing research effort on ECOLOGICAL THRESHOLDS and REGIME SHIFTS (see Glossary), whose underlying theoretical framework [5,6] (Box 1) has been shown to be applicable to a broad range of ecosystems from coral reefs to forests and lakes [7,8]. These concepts are now also making their way into the minds and discussions of policy makers and might soon be translated into legislative frameworks [9].…”

Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems

“…Local positive interactions include local facilitation and local seed dispersal. We model grazing pressure as higher mortality of {1}-cells, which is the minimal possible way of including grazing in our model 14 . Grazing may include other effects, such as soil trampling or non-random movement of the animals that we do not take into account in our model.…”

“…High grazing pressure pushes arid ecosystems towards the edge of extinction 1 . Increased aridity can then lead to desertification in a discontinuous way, where the possibility of recovery will be low [2][3][4]14 . How the consistent deviations from power laws exactly relate to desertification in the field is an important and urgent question for future research, because our model results suggest that such deviations may be early warning signals for desertification of arid ecosystems.…”

Pollution Control Policies and Natural Resource Dynamics: A Theoretical Analysis

“…Fourth, the mathematics that we use to identify the dynamics of the system is relatively simple. Indeed, all the properties that we discuss are presented graphically, with the style used by Noy-Meir (1975) in his remarkable paper on grazing systems.…”