2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1609.02086
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of higher-dimensional interval decomposable persistence modules

Abstract: The algebraic stability theorem for pointwise finite dimensional (p.f.d.) R-persistence modules is a central result in the theory of stability for persistence modules. We present a stability theorem for n-dimensional rectangle decomposable p.f.d. persistence modules up to a constant (2n − 1) that is a generalization of the algebraic stability theorem. We give an example to show that the bound cannot be improved for n = 2. The same technique is then applied to free n-dimensional modules and what we call triangl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a first step towards a general study of stability properties of the rank invariant that we introduce, we verify that the rank invariant is stable to perturbation of the zigzag modules valued in the category of finite dimensional vector spaces or in the category of finite sets (Section 6). This stability straightforwardly follows from the equivalence between our persistence diagrams and standard ones (Sections 3 and 5), together with stability results by Botnan, Lesnick and Bjerkevik [8,10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a first step towards a general study of stability properties of the rank invariant that we introduce, we verify that the rank invariant is stable to perturbation of the zigzag modules valued in the category of finite dimensional vector spaces or in the category of finite sets (Section 6). This stability straightforwardly follows from the equivalence between our persistence diagrams and standard ones (Sections 3 and 5), together with stability results by Botnan, Lesnick and Bjerkevik [8,10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…We obtain Theorem 6.6 below as a corollary of Theorem 5.2. We emphasize that the statement of this theorem is not the same as that of [10,Theorem 4.13] nor its strengthened version due to Bjerkevik [8]: a priori, dgm ZZ set (M ) is defined in a purely set-theoretical setting (Definitions 4.3 and 4.4), without invoking the notions of homology or Reeb graph considered in [10]. Our geometric interpretation of set-valued zigzag modules as Reeb graphs is used for proving Theorem 6.6 as follows: By functoriality of the linearization functor L F (Definition 5.1), d vec I (L F (M ), L F (N )) ≤ d set I (M , N ), (which was already discussed in [10]).…”
Section: Erosion and Bottleneck Stability For Set-valued Zigzag Modulesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general strategy for the proof of stability, particularly in Lemma 6.27 and Theorem 6.28 below, is similar to that used by Bjerkevik [3] to study algebraic stability in the context of multi-parameter persistence modules. The arguments needed for p-sheaves, however, are quite distinct.…”
Section: Persistence Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out earlier, the general strategy for the proof of stability is similar to that used by Bjerkevik in the study of multi-parameter persistence [3], although the arguments for p-sheaves differ substantially. A key matching result needed in the proof of the stability theorem, we employ the following classic result in combinatorics and graph theory.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%