2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00182-008-0122-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of marriage with externalities

Abstract: In many matching problems, it is natural to consider that agents may have preferences not only over the set of potential partners but also over what other matches occur. Once such externalities are considered, the set of stable matchings will depend on what agents believe will happen if they deviate. In this paper, we introduce endogenously generated beliefs (which depend on the preferences). We introduce a particular notion of endogenous beliefs, called sophisticated expectations, and show that with these bel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, most research has focused on identifying when stable matchings do and do not exist. Some papers have proceeded by constraining the matching problem through restrictions of the possible preference orderings, [3,7,11,12,15,17], while others have considered variations on the standard notion of stability [1,4,23]. Our paper also considers a restriction of the model which allows us to more easily characterize the class of stable matchings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, most research has focused on identifying when stable matchings do and do not exist. Some papers have proceeded by constraining the matching problem through restrictions of the possible preference orderings, [3,7,11,12,15,17], while others have considered variations on the standard notion of stability [1,4,23]. Our paper also considers a restriction of the model which allows us to more easily characterize the class of stable matchings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hafalir [27] takes a different approach centered around the negativity result of Theorem 2.3. The trick behind the negativity result of Theorem 2.3 is that for a given profile of estimation functions for each i ∈ M ∪ W , we can construct preferences such that φ-stable matchings do not exist without arguing whether estimations were sound based on the preferences at hand.…”
Section: An Extension Of the One-to-one Model Using Estimation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trick behind the negativity result of Theorem 2.3 is that for a given profile of estimation functions for each i ∈ M ∪ W , we can construct preferences such that φ-stable matchings do not exist without arguing whether estimations were sound based on the preferences at hand. Hafalir [27] first limits the estimation functions that can be construed based on the preferences of the agents. In this sense, estimation functions are endogenously given.…”
Section: An Extension Of the One-to-one Model Using Estimation Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 In fact, our main comparative statics result is new even in the setting without externalities as is our synthesis of classical and far-sighted stability. 8 The rich subsequent literature, e.g., Chowdhury (2004);Hafalir (2008); Eriksson, Jansson, and Vetander (2011);Chen (2013); Gudmundsson and Habis (2013); Salgado-Torres (2011a,b)-maintained the focus on the existence question while refining Sasaki and Toda's weak stability concept by varying the degree to which the rematches of other agents penalize the blocking pair. Bodine-Baron, Lee, Chong, Hassibi, and Wierman (2011) analyze a related weak stability concept in a setting with peer effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%