2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2007.4434669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of networked control systems with large delays

Abstract: Abstract-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of constant sampling intervals h k = h, ∀k, sufficient conditions for the feasibility of (12) in terms of (finite sets) of LMIs are proposed in [5] based on a (real) Jordan form representation of the NCS applicable to both small and large delays. Based on the sufficiency of (13) for ISS, the necessary derivations of the finite set of LMIs are similar to those in [5]. For the sake of brevity, we will omit such technicalities here.…”
Section: A Discrete-time Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of constant sampling intervals h k = h, ∀k, sufficient conditions for the feasibility of (12) in terms of (finite sets) of LMIs are proposed in [5] based on a (real) Jordan form representation of the NCS applicable to both small and large delays. Based on the sufficiency of (13) for ISS, the necessary derivations of the finite set of LMIs are similar to those in [5]. For the sake of brevity, we will omit such technicalities here.…”
Section: A Discrete-time Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These delays stem from the information flow between: a) the sensor and the controller, and b) the controller and the actuator. They have in general different characteristics depending primarily on the utilized network protocol, the scheduling methods and the communication overhead (packet collisions/retransmissions/losses) used in NCS, while their presence imposes strict limitations on the achievable feedback performance [1], [2], [3], [4]. For the case of a discrete static feedback implemented with a period h, these delays can be lumped into a single term τ k , where k refers to the sampling instant kh [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], LMIs are used for robust stability analysis and controller synthesis for networked systems subject to uncertain time-varying delays upper bounded by a sampling period; the case of NCS with delays longer than one sampling period is presented in [4], [6]. By treating the uncertain NCS delay as a time-varying parameter uncertainty, sufficient conditions, expressed as LMIs, for the existence of a static stabilizing state feedback controller appear in [7], [8], [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may also affect the establishment of the output. Several studies have modeled the linear systems with delays by differential equations covering both the present and the past states of the system, assuming that the derivative of the vector of states can be explained at every time t. Other studies consider delay systems as nonlinear and no stationary [6], [7] with parameters varying depending on time or the state of the system. The representation of such variation may be continuous or piecewise continuous [8].Modeling a delayed discrete time system as switched system is a new approach emerging from researches on lines supports and telecommunications systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%