2011
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-10-81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of the factorial structure of metabolic syndrome from childhood to adolescence: a 6-year follow-up study

Abstract: BackgroundMetabolic syndrome (MS) is a clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors that is considered a predictor of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and mortality. There is no consistent evidence on whether the MS construct works in the same way in different populations and at different stages in life.MethodsWe used confirmatory factor analysis to examine if a single-factor-model including waist circumference, triglycerides/HDL-c, insulin and mean arterial pressure underlies metabolic syndrome from the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, these results suggest that CVD risk factor levels are fairly stable from early childhood to adulthood. We did not find any sex differences in the tracking of clustered CVD risk (data not shown), which is similar to the results from some (11,12), but not all, studies (18). In the current study, all of the single risk factors included in the summed z-score had a positive tracking coefficient ( Table 2), which means that they all contributed to the tracking coefficient for the sum of z-score.…”
Section: Articlessupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taken together, these results suggest that CVD risk factor levels are fairly stable from early childhood to adulthood. We did not find any sex differences in the tracking of clustered CVD risk (data not shown), which is similar to the results from some (11,12), but not all, studies (18). In the current study, all of the single risk factors included in the summed z-score had a positive tracking coefficient ( Table 2), which means that they all contributed to the tracking coefficient for the sum of z-score.…”
Section: Articlessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…We found moderate to high levels of tracking between all the measured time points, and the risk of having a high sum of z-score at a second time point was between 2.3 and 30.8 times higher for children having a high sum of z-score at the first time point. Similarly, the only other study examining the stability of clustered CVD risk factors from childhood (age: 9 y) to adolescence (age: 15 y) in a sample of Swedish and Estonian children found moderate overall tracking coefficients for boys and girls, respectively (11). Moreover, studies looking at clustered CVD risk factor tracking from childhood or adolescence to adulthood displayed similar results (12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Correlation coefficients in- fatness determined by waist circumference and aerobic fitness were higher than other variables, similar to previous studies 23,36) . Also, moderate tracking of TG and blood pressure was consistent with previous studies 23,24,26,36) . Although it is difficult to explain these phenomena in detail, we suggest that single risk factors in the short-term were moderate to high stable from childhood to adolescence in Japanese children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The cardiometabolic risk score 1 is an average value computed from the gender-and age-specific z scores of the sum of 4 skinfolds, homoeostasis model assessment index, systolic blood pressure, triglyceride, total cholesterol/HDL ratio, and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO 2max ; this score was inverted by multiplying by -1) 31 ; the score 2 is an average value computed from the gender-and age-specific z scores of waist circumference, fasting insulin, triglyceride/HDL cholesterol ratio, and mean arterial pressure. 32,33 any marked extent for any of the confounders considered.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean arterial pressure was calculated. 30 We computed 2 well-established cardiometabolic risk scores (gender-and age-specific z scores) to be used in the main analyses, as proposed by Andersen et al 31 and Martínez-Vizcaino et al 32,33 See the biomarkers included in each score in the legend to Table 2. For sensitivity analyses, we selected these 2 risk scores, which largely differ from each other in the risk factors included (eg, markers of total versus abdominal fatness, homeostasis model assessment index versus fasting insulin, etc, for the Andersen's versus Martinez-Vizcaino scores, respectively).…”
Section: Physical Fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%