2019
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/14/08/p08004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability tests performed on the triple GEM detector built using commercially manufactured GEM foils in India

Abstract: A : The Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) technology is based on thin polymer foils cladded with copper on both the sides with a regular matrix of holes. Due to the limited manufacturing capacity of CERN, these GEM foils are now commercially manufactured also by Micropack Pvt. Ltd., a company based in India. In order to gain an insight on the behaviour of detectors built using the foils from Micropack, it is important to study various long and short term effects on these foils due to the applied voltage as well as… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations in gain for the first hour can be linked to charging up phenomena caused by avalanche charge deposition on the GEM foils [30] this charging up is also seen in the foil's leakage current test. Gain during the next 17 hours, on the other hand, is linked to the GEM foil's polarisation phenomenon, which is well understood and can be found elsewhere [31]. For constant incoming photon flux, a similar trend in rate(7.5 kHz to 9.4 kHz) and detector current(6.4 nA to 10.5 nA) is seen over first one and half hour of time, leading to the conclusion that the detector is less efficient in the early hours and reaches its maximum and stable plateau after a few hours or complete charging of foils.…”
Section: Gain Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Variations in gain for the first hour can be linked to charging up phenomena caused by avalanche charge deposition on the GEM foils [30] this charging up is also seen in the foil's leakage current test. Gain during the next 17 hours, on the other hand, is linked to the GEM foil's polarisation phenomenon, which is well understood and can be found elsewhere [31]. For constant incoming photon flux, a similar trend in rate(7.5 kHz to 9.4 kHz) and detector current(6.4 nA to 10.5 nA) is seen over first one and half hour of time, leading to the conclusion that the detector is less efficient in the early hours and reaches its maximum and stable plateau after a few hours or complete charging of foils.…”
Section: Gain Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This charging up is also seen in the foil's leakage current test. Gain during the next 17 hours, on the other hand, is linked to the GEM foil's polarisation phenomenon, which is well understood and can be found elsewhere [31]. For constant incoming photon flux, a similar trend in rate(7.5 kHz to 9.4 kHz) and detector current(6.4 nA to 10.5 nA) is seen over first one and half hour of time, leading to the conclusion that the detector is less efficient in the early hours and reaches its maximum and stable plateau after a few hours or complete charging of foils.…”
Section: Gain Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The setup described in the figure 2(a) has been used to measure the charging up effect. The electrodes were powered up for more than 12 hours prior to start of the measurement to avoid the polarisation effect [11]. The 109 cd source was attached to the detector and the effective gain and energy spectrum have been obtained in the regular interval of 5 and 2 minutes respectively.…”
Section: Jinst 15 P02003 4 Charging Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ltd. situated in Bangalore started manufacturing both double mask [7,8] and single mask GEM foils. Initially, company produced 10 × 10 cm 2 double mask GEM foils and these foils were tested both at foil and detector level at the GEM test facility at Delhi University [9][10][11]. In the double mask etching technique, it is essential to keep the mask alignment between top and bottom layers within 5-10 µm, due to which the size of GEM foil is limited to few tens of cm 2 of area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%