“…Apart from changing the electronic properties, , the denticity and the coordination modes of the ligands that can perturb the HOMO–LUMO energies, − changes in the steric effects and the nature of the side-chains , and functionalities capable of intra- or intermolecular noncovalent bond interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, π–π stacking, hydrophobic interaction, electrostatic interaction, metal–metal interaction, etc., − can lead to the perturbation of intermolecular forces. Given the propensity of platinum(II) complexes to form supramolecular self-assemblies via metal–metal interactions, together with π–π interactions, a minor perturbation of the molecular structure may induce significant changes in their supramolecular assembly and photophysical properties. , Thus, there has been a growing interest in the exploration of platinum(II) systems in developing functional stimuli-responsive materials, such as in novel sensors, encryption, and memory devices, when exposed to external stimuli, including heat, vapor, mechanical forces, and pressure. ,− In particular, the effects of mechanical forces and pressure have attracted much attention in the exploration of the mechanochromic and piezochromic properties of various organic dyes, small molecules, , metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), and metallacycles . Mechano- and piezochromic materials based on platinum(II) complexes have attracted much attention. ,− However, most of the works are focused on organic molecules and metal complexes of d 10 (coinage metal) and d 8 electronic configuration. − ,,− Among the d 8 metal complexes, platinum(II) complexes have been studied but mostly confined to mononuclear platinum(II) systems, with dinuclear platinum(II) complex systems almost unexplored except for the famous discrete Pt 2 (pop) 4 4– lantern-type system. ,− Unlike the study of the mononuclear platinum(II) system, where only intermolecular metal–metal and π–π interactions can be mod...…”