2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of swine faecal samples influences taxonomic and functional results in microbiome analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a favorable-quality DNA sample is initially required to amplify the full-length gene for long-read sequencing; therefore, one limitation of this approach is the difficulty of achieving full-length gene amplification in low-quality DNA samples. In the present study, the DNA in PDE samples was degraded for several reasons, including being collected without nucleic acid preservation (NAP), RNA/DNA Stabilization Buffer, multiple freeze-thaw events, and being kept at -20˚C for a long period of time (29). Degraded samples may have insufficient quantities of DNA to amplify the full-length 16S rDNA gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a favorable-quality DNA sample is initially required to amplify the full-length gene for long-read sequencing; therefore, one limitation of this approach is the difficulty of achieving full-length gene amplification in low-quality DNA samples. In the present study, the DNA in PDE samples was degraded for several reasons, including being collected without nucleic acid preservation (NAP), RNA/DNA Stabilization Buffer, multiple freeze-thaw events, and being kept at -20˚C for a long period of time (29). Degraded samples may have insufficient quantities of DNA to amplify the full-length 16S rDNA gene.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal housing conditions were described in a previously published paper ( Monger et al, 2022 ). The experimental design was approved by the Animal Protection Committee of Université Laval prior to the experiments (2019057–1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The digesta from pig number two at the Ctl2 period could not be collected as there was no digesta at the time of sampling. All the samples were stabilized using the PERFORMAbiome•GUT | PB-200 sampling kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (DNAgenotek, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) and as suggested elsewhere ( Monger et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different preservative methods have been proposed for stabilizing microbial community structures, especially for investigation of human fecal microbiota [29][30][31][32]. However, only a few published studies have investigated preservation methods using animal feces [33][34][35], and notably, these investigations did not include fecal samples from cattle. Additionally, little published research is available regarding impacts of preservatives on other important sample types such as respiratory secretions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%