2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00215-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of the stochastic point reactor kinetic equation through power feedback

Abstract: Most basic models for the power (or equivalently, the neutron population) in a nuclear core consider the power as a function of time (with an energetic and spatial distribution) and lead to deterministic description of the reactor kinetics. While these models are of common use and are undoubtedly the main analytic tool in understanding the reactor kinetics, the true nature of the power in a reactor core is stochastic and should be considered as a stochastic process in time. The stochastic fluctuations of the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noticed by Williams 1 , the variance-to-mean (V/M) ratio of the neutron population in the core would diverge linearly with time and a critical reactor would undergo a "critical catastrophe", namely unbounded power fluctuations (eventually leading to shutdown). In practice, feedback mechanisms such as the temperature effect at high power or operator-induced control rod movements at low power, supposedly quench the critical catastrophe 1,9,28 . The bounded behavior of the variance-to-mean ratio observed during the experiments therefore calls for a different modeling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noticed by Williams 1 , the variance-to-mean (V/M) ratio of the neutron population in the core would diverge linearly with time and a critical reactor would undergo a "critical catastrophe", namely unbounded power fluctuations (eventually leading to shutdown). In practice, feedback mechanisms such as the temperature effect at high power or operator-induced control rod movements at low power, supposedly quench the critical catastrophe 1,9,28 . The bounded behavior of the variance-to-mean ratio observed during the experiments therefore calls for a different modeling.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic model is developed using MATLAB/SIMULINK as shown in Figure (1). This model is based on; reactor point kinetics, with six groups of delayed neutrons, thermal hydraulic, one dimensional heat conduction created with lumped parameters and the feedback due to the; fuel and coolant temperature effects.…”
Section: -The Developed Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In zero-power reactors, the neutron flux density must be controlled, since it is proportional to the reactor power [1]. Ordinarily, these reactors do not virtually contain (or contains very small) number of free neutrons during shut down.…”
Section: -Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more "fundamental" approach-based on the true stochastic nature of power generation in a reactor core-describes neutron kinetics as a time stochastic process: "reactor noise"-Fig. 1 Kyoto University Critical Assembly in a subcritical configuration consisting of stochastic fluctuations of the power around the mean field (which is given by the deterministic models)-becomes then the basic topic for nuclear engineering [5]. However, stochastic models have well-known stability problems in that even if the mean field solution is stable, its variance grows linearly in time; this feature is not observed in real measurements and a conjecture is examined assuming that reactivity feedback provides the necessary stabilization mechanism.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%