2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of the total force in multi-finger pressing tasks studied with the ‘inverse piano’ technique

Abstract: When one finger changes its force, other fingers of the hand can show unintended force changes in the same direction (enslaving) and in the opposite direction (error compensation). We tested a hypothesis that externally imposed changes in finger force predominantly lead to error compensation effects in other fingers thus stabilizing the total force. A novel device, the "inverse piano", was used to impose controlled displacements to one of the fingers over different magnitudes and at different rates. Subjects (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such experiments involved hand positional tasks and transient changes in the force acting on the hand (Zhou et al 2014(Zhou et al , 2015b as well as multifinger force production tasks and transient positional perturbations applied to one of the fingers (Reschechtko et al 2014(Reschechtko et al , 2015Wilhelm et al 2013) with the "inverse piano" device (Martin et al 2011). In these experiments, if the appli- cation and removal of a perturbation were interrupted with a dwell time, the final position (force level) undershot the initial level, i.e., equifinality was violated (cf.…”
Section: Two Types Of Unintentional Force Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such experiments involved hand positional tasks and transient changes in the force acting on the hand (Zhou et al 2014(Zhou et al , 2015b as well as multifinger force production tasks and transient positional perturbations applied to one of the fingers (Reschechtko et al 2014(Reschechtko et al , 2015Wilhelm et al 2013) with the "inverse piano" device (Martin et al 2011). In these experiments, if the appli- cation and removal of a perturbation were interrupted with a dwell time, the final position (force level) undershot the initial level, i.e., equifinality was violated (cf.…”
Section: Two Types Of Unintentional Force Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were recorded using an inverse piano device (for a detailed overview of the inverse piano, see Martin et al 2011a). The device consisted of four unidirectional piezoelectric force transducers (208C02; PCB Piezotronics, Depew, NY) mounted on individual linear actuators (PS01-23x80; LinMot, Spreitenbach, Switzerland).…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that lifting a finger is expected to be transmitted mechanically to other fingers of the hand and lead to a drop in their forces. Although such effects could contribute to force changes observed during the finger lifting and lowering processes, their contribution has been estimated as small (Martin et al 2011a) leading to a conclusion on a major role of neural components in those counterdirectional force changes. We also emphasize that the main results of our study were obtained in the comparison of finger forces (and modes) before and after the lifting-lowering sequence when all of the fingers were at the same position.…”
Section: The Ucm Concept and Stability Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first of these studies, subjects were asked to produce a constant amount of force by pressing on force sensors with the four fingers of the right hand. A transient perturbation (liftingand-lowering a finger with the "inverse piano" device; Martin et al 2011) led to changes in all finger forces organized in such a way that intertrial variance in the space of finger forces was relatively high while variance of the total force was low. This was associated with V UCM Ͼ V ORT reflecting relatively low stability of the four-finger system in directions that span the UCM compared with the direction orthogonal to the UCM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%