2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2012.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilized germylenes based on dialkanolamines: Synthesis, structure, chemical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be attributed to the greater strength of the S–S bond in diethyl disulfide compared than in diphenyl disulfide. The relative reactivities of the germylenes based on diethylenetriamines with disulfides are similar to those found earlier for germanium(II) dialkanolamine derivatives 6…”
Section: Results and Discussion Germylene Synthesissupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be attributed to the greater strength of the S–S bond in diethyl disulfide compared than in diphenyl disulfide. The relative reactivities of the germylenes based on diethylenetriamines with disulfides are similar to those found earlier for germanium(II) dialkanolamine derivatives 6…”
Section: Results and Discussion Germylene Synthesissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Germylenes 2f – j based on a set of novel chelating bis(diarylamido) ligands were prepared for comparison. This work forms a part of our studies on the synthesis and investigation of “heavy carbene” analogues stabilized by polydentate ligands 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compounds 1 , 2 , R a ‐ 3 and S a ‐ 3 are monomeric in the solid state and show a distorted tetrahedral coordination at their germanium atom. The Ge‐S benzylic bond lengths (2.1836(5) Å and 2.1969(5) Å for 1 ; 2.157(2) Å and 2.164(2) Å for R a ‐ 3 ; 2.167(2) Å and 2.1707(19) Å for S a ‐ 3 ) and the Ge‐S benzenethiolate distances (2.2292(5) Å and 2.2270(5) Å for 1 ; 2.1910(7) Å and 2.1956(7) Å for 2 ) are in agreement with values reported for the structurally related 2,2’‐spirobi[benzo[ d ][1,3,2]dithiagermole] (Ge−S 2.195(2) – 2.199(2) Å) and other germanium thiolates exhibiting tetrahedral coordination of the germanium atom such as tetrakis(phenylthio)germane (Ge−S 2.2149(6) – 2.2191(5) Å) and tetrakis( p ‐tolylthio)germane (Ge−S 2.211(1) – 2.221(1) Å) . The Ge‐O benzylic bond lengths of thiolate 2 (1.744(2) Å and 1.7657(19) Å) and the Ge‐O phenolate distances of R a ‐ 3 (1.767(5) Å and 1.775(5) Å) and S a ‐ 3 (1.783(4) Å and 1.784(4) Å) are slightly shorter than the values reported for 6‐bromo‐2,2‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐4 H ‐1,3,2‐benzo[ d ]dioxagermine (Ge‐O benzylic 1.7846(18) Å and Ge‐O phenolate 1.8168(17) Å) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the additional coordination does not significantly influence the bond lengths in the Ge 2 O 2 ‐ring in relation to those in E – G . Compound 1 is the first example of an alkoxygermylene exhibiting additional intramolecular coordination by an oxygen donor, whereas additional intramolecular coordination by nitrogen donors has recently been reported for alkoxygermylenes based on dialkanolamides10 and ( Z )‐2‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethenolates 7f. The Ge–O terminal distances in ( 1 ) 2 are 1.799(4) Å, whereas the Ge–O bridging bond lengths are significantly longer [Ge1–O1 1.957(3) Å and Ge1–O1′ 2.020(3) Å].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%