2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.06.487388
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilizing brain-computer interfaces through alignment of latent dynamics

Abstract: Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) restore motor function to people with paralysis by translating brain activity into control signals for external devices. In current iBCIs, instabilities at the neural interface result in a degradation of decoding performance, which necessitates frequent supervised recalibration using new labeled data. One potential solution is to use the latent manifold structure that underlies neural population activity to facilitate a stable mapping between brain activity and b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although earlier attempts to achieve alignment via KLDM were only moderately successful, a recent approach using KLD to align neural latent dynamics identified using Latent Factor Analysis through Dynamical Systems (LFADS) (33, 34) was much more successful (32). In their evaluation, the resulting “Nonlinear Manifold Alignment with Dynamics” (NoMAD) also outperformed ADAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although earlier attempts to achieve alignment via KLDM were only moderately successful, a recent approach using KLD to align neural latent dynamics identified using Latent Factor Analysis through Dynamical Systems (LFADS) (33, 34) was much more successful (32). In their evaluation, the resulting “Nonlinear Manifold Alignment with Dynamics” (NoMAD) also outperformed ADAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches to address iBCI decoder instability include supervised techniques that aim at stabilizing iBCI performance by recalibrating the decoder during ongoing iBCI control by relying on access to the task output variables (28)(29)(30), as well as unsupervised methods that do not require to re-estimate decoder parameters and only need neural data, with no provided task output variables or task labels (9,16,21,31,32). We restricted our comparison to GAN-based aligners and PAF for several reasons.…”
Section: Comparison Of Gans To Other Methods For Ibci Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other algorithms also do not implement shapepreserving alignment strategies. For example, NoMAD (Karpowicz, 2022), uses a deep-learning based approach aimed at modeling underlying neural dynamics by combining data across sessions. Both decoding methods DAD (Dyer, 2017) and CEBRA (Schneider, 2022) rely on the common kinematic space to align neural data across sessions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aligned latent signals maintain a remarkably stable relation to behavior over months and even years 12 . As a consequence, a fixed decoder that uses these aligned signals as inputs remains accurate across long periods without supervised recalibration 11,12,23,24 .…”
Section: Neural Representations Of Motor Intent Are Similar Across Mo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques have been used to align the statistics of two clouds of points, independently of the time course of the associated signals 23,24,50 . These unsupervised methods have been tested on neural recordings corresponding to structured, trial-based behaviors, although they have been successful even without the use of any information about the behavior itself.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%