2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2019.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilizing predictive control with persistence of excitation for constrained linear systems

Abstract: Article:Hernandez Vicente, B.A. orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-5590 and Trodden, P.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-8787-7432 (2019) Stabilizing predictive control with persistence of excitation for constrained linear systems. Systems and Control Letters,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In dual control, the cost function often includes a term to maximize the level of excitation in the resulting trajectory [31,32,33,34,35,36]. According to Willems' lemma, a loss of full row rank means a loss of persistent excitation in a Hankel matrix.…”
Section: A Note On Singular Values Of the Trajectory Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dual control, the cost function often includes a term to maximize the level of excitation in the resulting trajectory [31,32,33,34,35,36]. According to Willems' lemma, a loss of full row rank means a loss of persistent excitation in a Hankel matrix.…”
Section: A Note On Singular Values Of the Trajectory Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective is to maintain the system state within a secure region centered around the origin, typically formulated as a convex problem. Introducing greater flexibility, an adaptive MPC [19], [20], [21] is devised, incorporating the fulfillment of the Persistence of Excitation (PE) condition [22]. This approach aims to ensure the controlled system exhibits properties of robust stability and recursive feasibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We omit the proof for brevity, but refer the reader to[8],[38] for the proof and to[41] for a discussion about model uncertainty.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%