2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilizing two-qubit entanglement by mimicking a squeezed environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studied physics also applies to other implementations, e.g., based on atomic scatterers or mechanically modulated devices. Our result adds to the growing interest of time-modulated qubits and interactions that have, e.g., been suggested for faster 2-qubit gate implementations 39 , entanglement stabilization 40 and already been used for controlled photon release in photonic cluster state generation 41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The studied physics also applies to other implementations, e.g., based on atomic scatterers or mechanically modulated devices. Our result adds to the growing interest of time-modulated qubits and interactions that have, e.g., been suggested for faster 2-qubit gate implementations 39 , entanglement stabilization 40 and already been used for controlled photon release in photonic cluster state generation 41 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Recent years have witnessed successful implementations of quantum computation principles in systems featuring multiple qubits. Within this context, various studies have advocated using driven qubits as a strategy for stabilization [2,3]. The scalability of coherently interacting qubits is pivotal for achieving efficient fault-tolerant quantum computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most dissipative state stabilization protocols proposed and implemented to date have focused on few-body entanglement stabilization, e.g. 2-qubit Bell states [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], 3-qubit W states [28], bosonic cat states [29,30], or small manifolds of states in bosonic systems [31][32][33]. Beyond this, the design and implementation of "scalable" dissipative stabilization protocols which can be extended to stabilize N -qubit entangled states persists as an open question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we will not consider approximate stabilization protocols, which rely on stabilizing a pure state |ψ = N (|ψ + |ξ ) which has a large overlap with the desired target state |ψ . Several works have explored such protocols for stabilizing Bell states, as the freedom available in choosing |ξ can translate into simpler interactions; for instance, only local drives and linear dissipation [25,27]. However, these protocols always have some minimum intrinsic steady-state error, ∼ | | 2 , which invariably leads to a tradeoff between the stabilization time (τ ) and achievable steady-state error (ε ∞ ) [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%