“…Recently, g-C 3 N 4 has received considerable attention as a promising photocatalyst, owing to its ease of preparation, high stability, low cost, clean and low toxicity, narrowed bandgap (∼2.7 eV), and special two-dimensional (2D) layered structure ( Shi et al, 2016 ; Teng et al, 2017 ; Han et al, 2018 ; Deng et al, 2019 ; Ong et al, 2020 ; Vu et al, 2020 ; Yu et al, 2021 ); however, diverse drawbacks include poor efficiency of light utilization and low separation of photogenerated charges during the application, making g-C 3 N 4 less attractive for photocatalyst construction. ( Tahir et al, 2014 ; Liu et al, 2017 ; Al Marzouqi et al, 2019 ; Fu et al, 2019 ; Fan et al, 2020 ). In addition, bulk g-C 3 N 4 with a low surface area and irregular morphology prepared through the conventional method leads to the low transfer rate of interfacial charge and poor photocatalytic activity ( Teng et al, 2017 ; Niu et al, 2018 ).…”